Seanad debates

Wednesday, 20 November 2002

Digital Hub Development Agency Bill, 2002: Committee Stage (Resumed).

 

Photo of Feargal QuinnFeargal Quinn (Independent)

I understand the Minister's point and will not press the amendment.

On the tele-conferencing issue, the amendment states:

(7) For the avoidance of doubt, any meeting of the Agency which is held in whole or in part by means of tele-conferencing shall be a valid meeting.

As will be gathered from the inclusion of the phrase, "For the avoidance of doubt", I do not suggest and the Minister is correct to say that the amendment is necessary to validate meetings which are held using tele-conferencing. I have used it once or twice for meetings and I understand the best legal advice considers that it is not an issue.

I tabled the amendment because its inclusion gives a suitable digital flavour to the Bill. It shows that we expect the board to make full use of the technology available to it. I will not go to the stake on this, but it would be a nice touch to add it to the Bill. I understand the Minister's point and happily withdraw the amendment on the basis of having made the point.

Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Amendments Nos. 20 and 21 not moved.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.