Seanad debates

Thursday, 24 October 2002

Sub-committee of the Committee on Procedure and Privileges: Motion (Resumed).

 

Fergal Browne (Fine Gael)

I agree with the views expressed by the last two speakers. The Seanad needs to be topical and must react more quickly. We have not yet debated the report of the Flood tribunal. By the time we do so, most people will have forgotten it. The Dáil debated the matter immediately and the Seanad will be seen to be weeks behind. That does this House no service.

I agree with Senator Ulick Burke regarding the suggestion that Senators be allowed to put down a question for written or oral reply. That is why we are here. I realise that we will not have the same privileges as TDs but we should have some options for putting down questions and receiving answers. Senators need more powers to interrupt and question a Minister. That would make the House more relevant and more of a debating chamber. I realise that the Seanad has no power with regard to financial Bills and reform of that area should be considered.

Members spoke about the regional basis for Seanad elections. Seanad elections could be modelled on European constituencies. Members of certain panels could stand for election on a geographical basis. The university panels are most obviously in need of reform and they should be opened up to institutes of technology and other universities not currently recognised. The system is discriminatory and there is broad agreement in the House that there should be reform.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.