Results 1-20 of 133 for mick wallace nama

Public Accounts Committee: Northern Ireland Assembly Finance Committee: Discussion on NAMA Project Eagle Sale (1 Oct 2015) See 1 other result from this debate

Joe Costello: I appreciate all of that. This week, Deputy Mick Wallace raised some other issues in the Dáil relating to Project Eagle and other activities. The Taoiseach requested that Deputy Wallace would come before this committee but he has again declined to do so. Deputy Robert Dowds has e-mailed Deputy Wallace requesting that he put forward questions that this committee could pose to NAMA...

Public Accounts Committee: National Asset Management Agency: Financial Statements 2014 (Resumed) (1 Oct 2015)

John McGuinness: ...to ensure there is a follow-up to it. On general matters, I will not delay the witnesses, as we are here for quite a while. Without going again into the allegations that were made by Deputy Mick Wallace in the Dáil, I listened to what the witnesses had to say. When the allegations were made in the House, did NAMA consider contacting Deputy Wallace to say it had the answers to all...

Other Questions: NAMA Operations (16 May 2018) See 2 other results from this debate

Mick Wallace: 10. To ask the Minister for Finance if he has discussed the Data Protection Commissioner's ruling on NAMA and a group (details supplied) with the NAMA CEO and chairman; the reason NAMA has not appealed the ruling; the steps NAMA is taking to ensure it is in full compliance with data protection law; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21446/18]

Written Answers — Department of Finance: NAMA Operations (22 Jun 2017)

Mick Wallace: 63. To ask the Minister for Finance his plans to initiate a section 227 review of NAMA, with regard to the achievement of NAMA’s purposes under the NAMA Act 2009, in view of the recent commencement of the commission of investigation into NAMA and Project Eagle; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [29319/17]

Leaders' Questions (26 Nov 2015) See 2 other results from this debate

Mick Wallace: Any allegations I have made against NAMA have zero to do with my business. I never had interaction with NAMA through my business. I did not go into NAMA. The Tánaiste seems to be deliberately failing to interpret what I have said. I have given her some new information and I have outlined how I was told untruths by NAMA when it was questioned. The Tánaiste does not seem to have...

Written Answers — Department of Finance: NAMA Transactions (14 Feb 2019)

Mick Wallace: 32. To ask the Minister for Finance his views on the fact that multiple NAMA transactions since 2010 may have been in breach of section 172 of the NAMA Act; if he or NAMA has had engagement with An Garda Síochána or the DPP regarding their ongoing investigation into one specific transaction concerning a section 172 breach; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7355/19]

Other Questions: National Monuments (3 Oct 2012) See 1 other result from this debate

Mick Wallace: The Minister said that planning permission was granted to the developer. However, the developer is involved with NAMA, which now owns the site. As such, NAMA owns the planning permission. The Minister has more control than he realises. My understanding is that once a developer is involved with NAMA it is within its remit to control the sites involved, which are owned by the taxpayer. Is...

Written Answers — Department of Finance: NAMA Operations (28 Feb 2017)

Mick Wallace: 69. To ask the Minister for Finance if he will reassess the role given to NAMA to address the current housing crisis; if consideration will be given to suspending the NAMA plan to build 20,000 houses by 2020; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10012/17]

Written Answers — Department of Finance: NAMA Board (28 Feb 2017)

Mick Wallace: 73. To ask the Minister for Finance his plans to fill the one remaining position on the NAMA board under section 19 of the NAMA Act 2009, with due consideration for the expertise and experience listed in section 19; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10011/17]

Written Answers — Department of Finance: NAMA Loans Sale (5 Jul 2017)

Mick Wallace: 42. To ask the Minister for Finance the extent to which NAMA considered the tax structures of potential bidders for assets being sold by NAMA; the impact of these to the potential returns to the State; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31469/17]

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: Wards of Court: Discussion (11 Oct 2017)

Mick Wallace: The NAMA legislation is somewhat vague. NAMA claims a certain private status in its work, yet everything it has done can be scrutinised by the Comptroller and Auditor General despite that fact. It is one of the reasons it felt no obligation to provide a social dividend.

Written Answers — Department of Finance: State Aid Investigations (30 Jan 2018) See 1 other result from this answer

Mick Wallace: 94. To ask the Minister for Finance his views on a statement (details supplied) by An Taoiseach on NAMA; his policy on NAMA and its role in the private sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4233/18]

Ceisteanna Eile - Other Questions: NAMA Transactions (17 Apr 2019)

Mick Wallace: 44. To ask the Minister for Finance if he has had discussions with NAMA officials or his officials with regard to the UN special rapporteur letter on Ireland which stated that 93% of NAMA assets have been sold to foreign investors; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17801/19]

Written Answers — Department of Finance: NAMA Operations (4 Apr 2017) See 1 other result from this answer

Mick Wallace: 66. To ask the Minister for Finance his views on whether the NAMA policy of deleting e-mails of former staff who are not deemed business-critical will impact on the ability of any future commission of investigation into NAMA to fully examine all evidence available; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16450/17]

Leaders' Questions (29 Sep 2015) See 2 other results from this debate

Mick Wallace: Is the Taoiseach going to give serious consideration to the questions that are swirling around in respect of NAMA? As I said before, the workings of NAMA have left too much to be desired and there is a lot which is rotten about it. Is it going to be the Taoiseach's legacy that he ignored all of this? Is it going to be part of his history that he chose to ignore what is going on in NAMA?

Ceisteanna - Questions (Resumed) - Priority Questions: NAMA Operations (27 Mar 2018)

Mick Wallace: 62. To ask the Minister for Finance his views on the NAMA policy, agreed in March 2015, of deleting emails of staff one year after they have left the agency; if he has had discussions with officials in his Department or with the NAMA board regarding this ongoing policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14033/18]

Leaders' Questions (Resumed) (12 Jun 2018)

Mick Wallace: Does the Taoiseach not think the Minister for Finance, Deputy Donohoe, should answer the questions and not get NAMA to answer questions about it? Does the Taoiseach think it is okay for the Minister for Finance to send NAMA the questions, so it can answer the questions? One could not make it up. What is going on in this place?

Written Answers — Department of Finance: NAMA Operations (17 Jan 2017)

Mick Wallace: 81. To ask the Minister for Finance if he will consider suspending all operations of NAMA pending the outcome of all current investigations into the sale of Project Eagle by NAMA, including those by the National Crime Agency, Securities and Exchange Commission, the FBI and the Committee of Public Accounts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1720/17]

Written Answers — Department of Finance: Land Development Agency (14 Feb 2019)

Mick Wallace: 30. To ask the Minister for Finance if he envisages NAMA and NTMA staff being seconded to the Land Development Agency; if he has discussed same with the Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government, the interim CEO of the Land Development Agency and the chairman and CEO of NAMA; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7354/19]

Ceisteanna - Questions - Priority Questions: Criminal Prosecutions (16 May 2018) See 1 other result from this debate

Mick Wallace: 7. To ask the Minister for Finance if he has had discussions with the NAMA chairman or CEO regarding a court case involving a former NAMA official charged with leaking information that the DPP decided not to prosecute; if so, the details of the discussions; if no other instances of leaking have occurred within NAMA, his further views on whether the Data Protection Commissioner should...