Results 341-360 of 23,060 for speaker:Paddy Burke
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: It is inappropriate for the Senator to use language of that nature.
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Is Senator Ryan withdrawing his first comment?
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: It is not appropriate language for the Senator to use, in fairness.
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Is Senator Ryan withdrawing the remark?
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Both of them.
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Is the Senator withdrawing the remarks?
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: That is not a point of order. Is Senator Ryan withdrawing the remarks he made?
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: I thank the Senator.
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: The Senator cannot refer to Members of the Lower House.
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: There is a precedent that no reference should be made to Members of the Lower House. Each House respects the other's Members.
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: That is a matter for the other House. I rule that the Senator will respect the Members of the Lower House.
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: It may well be, but the Chair rules that Senators respect Members of the Lower House.
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Citizenship Rights for Non-Nationals: Motion (7 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Criminal Law (Insanity) Bill 2002: Committee Stage (Resumed). (8 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Amendments Nos. 7 and 103 are related and may be discussed together. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Criminal Law (Insanity) Bill 2002: Committee Stage (Resumed). (8 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Amendments Nos. 9 and 74 are related and may be discussed together. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Criminal Law (Insanity) Bill 2002: Committee Stage (Resumed). (8 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Is amendment No. 12 being pressed?
- Seanad: Criminal Law (Insanity) Bill 2002: Committee Stage (Resumed). (8 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Amendments Nos. 129 and 130 are related to amendment No. 13. Amendment No. 139 is consequential on those amendments and all may be discussed together by agreement.
- Seanad: Criminal Law (Insanity) Bill 2002: Committee Stage (Resumed). (8 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: It is a matter for the Senators who tabled the amendments. It must be noted that amendments cannot be re-entered on Report Stage unless they have been discussed on Committee Stage.
- Seanad: Criminal Law (Insanity) Bill 2002: Committee Stage (Resumed). (8 Apr 2004)
Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 133 in the name of Senator Terry is out of order as it involves a potential charge on the Revenue. Amendment No. 133 not moved.