Results 41-60 of 6,407 for speaker:Emmet Stagg
- Written Answers — Planning and Development Act 2000: Planning and Development Act 2000 (10 Feb 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Question 449: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if regulations bringing into force section 261 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 have been made; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3943/04]
- Order of Business. (17 Feb 2004)
Emmet Stagg: The House might note this is another Bill among the 100% of Bills since Christmas to be guillotined.
- Order of Business. (17 Feb 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Verifiability is the issue here and the Taoiseach did not deal with it.
- Written Answers — Tax Compliance. : Tax Compliance. (17 Feb 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Question 105: To ask the Minister for Finance if he has concluded his consideration of correspondence received from the Standards in Public Office Commission drawing his attention to limitations in the Ethics in Public Office Act 1995, arising from consideration of a case (details supplied); if he has now decided on the steps to be taken to address the issues raised by the commission; and if...
- Written Answers — Offshore Accounts: Offshore Accounts (17 Feb 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Question 177: To ask the Minister for Finance the basis of the recent reported settlement between the Revenue Commissioners and the owners of Ansbacher Cayman arising from the Ansbacher inquiry; the amount paid in settlement; if this represents the full and final settlement of tax liability by the owners; the amount still estimated to be outstanding in terms of the tax liability of others...
- Leaders' Questions. (30 Mar 2004)
Emmet Stagg: These are her proposals.
- Written Answers — State Property: State Property (30 Mar 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Question 467: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if, further to Parliamentary Question No. 272 of 3 March 2004, there is evidence extant that would demonstrate that his predecessor only agreed to a joint review of the issue of shooting on State lands by a scientific group on the basis that it was without prejudice; if evidence exists, if he would make it...
- Written Answers — State Property: State Property (30 Mar 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Question 468: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the policy and reasons instructing his open season orders for the hunting of various game birds and which are detailed in annexe 11 of the 79/409 birds directive; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that such orders and annexe 11 lists indicate that hunting of the listed species is sustainable hunting...
- Written Answers — State Property: State Property (30 Mar 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Question 469: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his attention has been drawn to the fact that lifting of the ban on hunting on State-owned lands using a ministerial open season order would not be in breach of any international commitments entered into by Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9742/04]
- Written Answers — State Property: State Property (30 Mar 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Question 470: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he would disclose the names of the experts and describe their qualifications in his Department whose advice he accepted and which led to him continuing the ban on hunting on State lands thereby rejecting the report of the scientific group consisting of persons (details supplied) being nominees of the...
- Written Answers — State Property: State Property (30 Mar 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Question 471: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his attention has been drawn to the fact that a Deputy (details supplied), being mandated by the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, announced to the National Association of Regional Game Councils AGM in Cavan in October 2003 that the Minister would allow a return to shooting on...
- Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004: Second Stage. (21 Apr 2004)
Emmet Stagg: On a point of order, on Holy Thursday it was stated that Second Stage of the Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004 would be taken. However, no order was made to take the Bill, only a decision that there would be a debate on it. The Government Whip, who is well briefed on procedures, has correctly sent us a schedule which states that an order is required because no order has...
- Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004: Second Stage. (21 Apr 2004)
Emmet Stagg: We oppose that because the order has not been made in the House.
- Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004: Second Stage. (21 Apr 2004)
Emmet Stagg: I suggest that we adjourn the House for 15 minutes to clarify the matter for all sides.
- Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004: Second Stage. (21 Apr 2004)
Emmet Stagg: On a point of orderââ
- Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004: Second Stage. (21 Apr 2004)
Emmet Stagg: On a point of order, the Minister should not be so arrogant.
- Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004: Second Stage. (21 Apr 2004)
Emmet Stagg: Can the Minister obey the Chair? A point of order has been called. He should sit down.
- Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004: Second Stage. (21 Apr 2004)
Emmet Stagg: As there is doubt about this matter, the House should adjourn for 15 minutes to allow the Whips to meet to clarify the situation and come back to the House with an order. That would be a suitable way to proceed in an orderly fashion.
- Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004: Second Stage. (21 Apr 2004)
Emmet Stagg: It has not.
- Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2004: Second Stage. (21 Apr 2004)
Emmet Stagg: When was that order made?