Results 1,821-1,840 of 12,886 for speaker:Paul Coghlan

Seanad: An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: The Senator does not have to elaborate. Is it being pressed?

Seanad: An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Senator you have had your say. I have asked you if the amendment is being pressed.

Seanad: An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: I do not need your explanation.

Seanad: An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Is the Order of Business agreed?

Seanad: An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: The Senator should resume his seat. If Members want to have a conversation they can have it outside the Chamber.

Seanad: Business of Seanad (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Before proceeding with item No. 1, I welcome to the Public Gallery Councillor Pa O'Driscoll, Simone Kavanagh and all our visitors. They are very welcome.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: It was agreed.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: I asked if it was agreed and I thought all Senators agreed to it.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Amendments Nos. 87a and 87b, in Senators McDowell, Boyhan and Craughwell, are related and may be discussed together by agreement. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Before I call on Senator Craughwell to resume, I would like to welcome to the Public Gallery Deputy Margaret Murphy O'Mahoney and her guests, Michael, Cian and Caoimhe Walsh from Bandon. They are very welcome. I ask Senator Craughwell to resume on amendment No. 87a.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Is the Senator making a point of order?

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: No. Once there is a quorum in the House, that is it.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Amendments Nos. 88, 88a and 89 are related. Amendment No. 88a is a physical alternative to amendment No. 88 and amendment No. 89 is consequential on amendment No. 88. Amendments Nos. 88 and 89 may be discussed together by agreement. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Amendment No. 90, in the names of Senators McDowell, Boyhan and Craughwell, has been discussed with amendment No. 78.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Amendment No. 91, in the name of Senators Bacik, Humphreys, Nash and Ó Ríordáin, has already been discussed with amendment No. 86. Is the amendment being moved?

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: The amendment has already been discussed.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Now I understand why Senator Bacik is waiting for the Minister.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: Of course.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: I welcome the Minister back to the House. Senator Bacik may now move her amendment and speak to the Minister.

Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (20 Feb 2019)

Paul Coghlan: No, it does not.