Advanced search
Show most relevant results first | Most recent results are first | Show use by person

Search only Jonathan O'BrienSearch all speeches

Results 1,701-1,720 of 8,015 for speaker:Jonathan O'Brien

Committee on Budgetary Oversight: Priorities for Budget 2019: Discussion (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: I will take even less time.

Committee on Budgetary Oversight: Priorities for Budget 2019: Discussion (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: I will not even ask a question. I want to correct the record which has just been inaccurately corrected. The heading of build-acquisition-lease does not cover social housing.

Committee on Budgetary Oversight: Priorities for Budget 2019: Discussion (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: It does not.

Committee on Budgetary Oversight: Priorities for Budget 2019: Discussion (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: No social housing was built in County Wicklow.

Committee on Budgetary Oversight: Priorities for Budget 2019: Discussion (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: That is factual.

Committee on Budgetary Oversight: Priorities for Budget 2019: Discussion (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: It is because they are the figures from the Department.

Committee on Budgetary Oversight: Priorities for Budget 2019: Discussion (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: What I was going to say was that we needed to have an honest conversation about some of the facts being used and the information being put out. I have just heard Deputy Barry Cowen say the fiscal space will probably be reduced to a figure of €700 million as a result of a deal Fianna Fáil did with its partners in government.

Committee on Budgetary Oversight: Priorities for Budget 2019: Discussion (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: Let us have an honest conversation. In the economic statement just published, the Government states there is €800 million for further allocation. If we were to look at the fiscal rules and adhere to them, particularly the expenditure benchmark - the benchmark that has been implemented for the past number of years - they are there for a reason and that is to prevent this...

Written Answers — Department of Public Expenditure and Reform: Public Sector Pay (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: 167. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the outstanding policies of financial emergency measures in the public interest, FEMPI, legislation pertaining to pay restoration. [26317/18]

Written Answers — Department of Public Expenditure and Reform: Public Sector Pay (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: 168. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the estimated cost of unwinding financial emergency measures in the public interest, FEMPI, and restoring pay disaggregated by salary brackets. [26318/18]

Written Answers — Department of Public Expenditure and Reform: Public Sector Pay (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: 169. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the estimated cost of unwinding financial emergency measures in the public interest, FEMPI, and restoring pay disaggregated by department and public role, for example, nurses or teachers and so on. [26319/18]

Written Answers — Department of Public Expenditure and Reform: Public Sector Pay (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: 170. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the estimated cost of unwinding financial emergency measures in the public interest, FEMPI, according to the current approach. [26320/18]

Written Answers — Department of Education and Skills: Schools Building Projects (19 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: 184. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills if he will address a matter (details supplied) regarding the schools PPP bundle 5. [26232/18]

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: I will come to Mr. Gleeson later. Mr. Connors said at that meeting that he had had a conversation with the SCA outside this room and that somebody from the agency had given him two names. Is that person present? Mr. Breen.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: Did Mr. Breen give Mr. Connors outside this room two names of the individuals who told him that all the women had been informed?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: So Mr. Breen did not give any names to Mr. Connors at any stage outside this committee room.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: Just to be clear on the names Mr. Breen gave him, the evidence presented to this committee was that Mr. Breen gave him two names of individuals who told the State Claims Agency that all women had been informed. That is not the case.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: Does Mr. Connors wish to comment?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: In response to my question at that meeting when I asked who told the State Claims Agency that all women had been informed, Mr. Connors said that he had been given two names-----

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Jonathan O'Brien: ----- who had actually said that. Does he accept that is now not the case?

   Advanced search
Show most relevant results first | Most recent results are first | Show use by person

Search only Jonathan O'BrienSearch all speeches