Results 16,941-16,960 of 28,162 for speaker:Catherine Murphy
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: Did the State Claims Agency communicate that to the HSE?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: What date was that?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: Once the State Claims Agency took responsibility for the case, the HSE would not have been informed that it was ongoing, would it? Did the State Claims Agency not look for records from the HSE? Did it have communication with the HSE?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: Who would the State Claims Agency normally have dealt with on this?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: That is quite interesting. I am pleased to hear that there is co-operation, but it is on the prosecuting side that this help would have taken place. That is to prosecute cases.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: The State Claims Agency's level of engagement would have been only at that level. It would not have been further up the ladder.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: I remember Mr. O'Brien saying to this committee that the first he heard of the Vicky Phelan case was on the day it was on the news, which I think came as a surprise.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: Were there other cases at the same time?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: CervicalCheck.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: Was the State Claims Agency in correspondence with or talking to the HSE about those other cases? It must have been.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: Did the risk analysis change as a consequence of the Vicky Phelan case and the other cases?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: What did the State Claims Agency do? That is what I want to get to. What did it do, if anything, to make sure that everyone was informed? Was Mr. Breen satisfied or did he take it as a given that everyone was informed?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: When was that?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: That was around 20 April.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: What engagement did the State Claims Agency then have with the HSE on the matter?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: Did Mr. Breen talk to Mr. Gleeson at that stage about women not being informed?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: We would not have been here discussing that matter had there not been the controversy in advance of it, so it was well known at that point. The Vicky Phelan case had been in the public arena. There had been debates in the Dáil and there were meetings in other committees as well as this one. I say that in regard to timing and what Mr. Breen said at this committee. I cannot figure...
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: I refer to Mr. Gleeson's earlier statement, "What I tried to say later was I did not think anyone from CervicalCheck could have said that because it would never have been our understanding", that communications with all women had been made.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: Mr. Gleeson did not qualify what he meant by "all women". We were discussing what we understood to be 208 women, which subsequently transpired to be 209 women. That was the group about which we were talking; we were not talking about another group. That is the group to which we were told Mr. Gleeson was referring in his statement; it was not another group.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Catherine Murphy: I wish to move on to the retrieval of records as mentioned in the opening statement and the video presentation. At the meeting on 17 May, we were told that women would be facilitated in getting their records in the context of the experience of a person going to Limerick and not being able to get her records having been raised. We are now being told that in the absence of fully computerised...