Results 14,401-14,420 of 19,173 for speaker:Shane Ross
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: I did not ask that.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: And then they are chosen by the last board.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: Yes, and the nomination committee proposes people. How come a former chief executive is on the board?
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: It is against corporate governance rules to have a former chief executive on the board.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: It is considered extremely bad, certainly in the world of public companies, to put a former chief executive on the board because of the difficulties of their having control after they leave.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: I do not think Ms Kerins is right. I do not want to mention any high profile cases, but Ms Kerins will find there are such cases.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: Why does Ms Kerins think we invited the remuneration committee to attend?
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: Perhaps she will tell us who is on the remuneration committee - I am sorry to interrupt - but maybe that would help. Who is on the remuneration committee at Rehab?
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: Four, yes.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: Why does she think we asked them in?
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: That statement is somewhat difficult to take. We are entitled to ask to attend the people who we think will be useful to us. For Ms Kerins to come back and say Rehab has decided the other people will or somebody else will attend is absurd. It is clear that we wanted to ask questions on this whole issue of remuneration, and on which this whole meeting has concentrated more than any others....
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: Can we also have the Hay report that Ms Kerins referred to?
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: Ms Kerins referred to it in her statement.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: When was the Towers Watson report written?
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: When was it given to Rehab? If it was for 2014 then it must have been in the past couple of months.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: That is when it was written so it must have been updated in the past few weeks.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: Can we take it that there has been an alteration to Ms Kerins' salary in the past few weeks?
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: Was there a reduction in Ms Kerins’ salary this year?
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: There was an increase.
- Public Accounts Committee: Payments to Section 39 Companies: Discussion (27 Feb 2014)
Shane Ross: That is fine. Go ahead.