Results 1,401-1,420 of 12,886 for speaker:Paul Coghlan
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Right. I thought the Senator might have indicated he was going to stray.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Well.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Yes.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: The comment is entirely irrelevant to amendment No. 96b.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Yes.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Amendment No. 96b, yes.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Is the Senator finished?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: He should move on.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Does the Minister wish to comment?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Amendment No. 96b.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: It is totally in order.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: How stands the amendment?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Will the Senators claiming the division please rise?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: As fewer than five Members have risen I declare the question defeated. The names of the Senators who stood will be recorded in the Journal of the Proceedings of the Seanad.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Amendment No. 97 has already been discussed with amendment No. 96.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: My note indicates that it was. Is the note incorrect?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: The amendment is in the name of the Government and your good selves.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: There is agreement on this.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Both sides have proposed this amendment. This amendment has been discussed with amendment No. 96 but I will allow a brief comment.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I was allowing the Senator a brief comment.