Results 1,341-1,360 of 12,886 for speaker:Paul Coghlan
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I welcome the Minister back to the House. On the last occasion progress was reported on section 50, but no Senator had contributed on the section. I am happy to hear contributions by Senators on it.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: The note I have tells me that no Senator had contributed on the section. Is any Senator offering to speak to it or is the Minister offering to do so?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Is the Senator offering?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: With respect, Senator, I will decide that matter. Please, Senator Norris.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: As the Senator knows, we are on Committee Stage.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I must correct myself slightly. I am advised that we were on amendment No. 97c, amendments Nos. 97a and 97b having been disposed of.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Amendment No. 97c is to section 50.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: The Senator may not, but I thank him for offering.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: No, the Senator will not be allowed to make it again in any language. I might not understand him, but that is neither here nor there.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Is Senator McDowell pressing the amendment?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I believe the amendment is lost.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I am now advised that the amendment was decided previously and declared lost.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: No, there will be no further proceedings on it.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Order, please. Senators should leave the Chamber quietly.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Senator Norris should not have been anticipating it.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: No interruptions.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Allow the Minister to proceed without interruption.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I believe the argument has been exhausted on that question.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Will the Senators claiming a division please rise?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (28 May 2019)
Paul Coghlan: As fewer than five Members have risen I declare the amendment lost. In accordance with Standing Order 61 the names of the Senators dissenting will be recorded in the Journal of the Proceedings of the Seanad.