Results 13,021-13,040 of 13,214 for speaker:Pat Gallagher

Seanad: Shooting Regulations. (26 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: There has been a long-standing policy of not allowing hunting on State lands acquired and managed for nature conservation purposes. The reasons for this approach are twofold: to protect the safety of people visiting and using national parks and to avoid compromising the nature conservation status of these lands. In 1999, the then Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands...

Seanad: Shooting Regulations. (26 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: Following the advice issued by the Heritage Council and at the request of the National Association of Regional Game Councils, NARGC, the previous Minister agreed in early 2002, without prejudice, to a joint examination by a scientific group, comprising officials of the Department and nominees of NARGC, of the question of permitting hunting on State lands, from a scientific perspective only....

Seanad: Shooting Regulations. (26 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: It is also the case that the lands in question amount to only approximately 1% of the land area of the State, while extensive facilities for hunting are available on Coillte lands, as the Senator pointed out, privately owned land and foreshore. The Minister also had to take account of considerations of public safety and confidence and of the potential exposure of the State to claims for...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages. (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: The first part of amendment No. 1 reflects what will happen when the Bill is enacted and, consequently, I hope Senator Quinn will accept my undertaking that the commencement order will reflect this point. With regard to the second part of the amendment, the commission's terms of reference in Schedule 5, together with sections 21 and 22, state the commission's reports will comprise...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages. (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: Senator Quinn has brought it to our attention that section 2 does not include software. I refer the Members to the citation in section 1 which provides that the Bill must be read in conjunction with a number of other Acts such as the Electoral (Amendment) Act 2001, particularly section 138 of that Act. It applies to referenda and presidential elections and clearly refers to software. With...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages (Resumed). (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: As I indicated on a number of occasions on previous Stages of the Bill, the question of publication of the source code will be examined later in the year, having regard to the security and secrecy of the ballot. As intended, my Department will be examining the count rules in the context of electronic voting and counting to provide that all the votes of elected candidates will be examined in...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages (Resumed). (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: We select what suits us. I am pointing out what the commission said regarding the findings of the experts retained by it.

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages (Resumed). (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: The 14 days have elapsed and nothing further can be done. Neither would we interfere.

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages (Resumed). (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: It is the law of the land.

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages (Resumed). (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: I cannot respond.

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages (Resumed). (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: This matter has been debated extensively but I have not heard any substantive reasons for the inclusion of this amendment, nor am I aware of any other country using such a facility. Whether the facility should be provided is the subject of debate. It is not a proven requirement nor is it a statutory requirement. There are arguments on both sides but the commission will consider the matter. We...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages (Resumed). (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: As I have indicated on a number of occasions, including yesterday, it is the intention to review the count rules, having regard to the calculation and distribution of votes. It affects only surpluses, not eliminations. The review will also cover other areas linked to some arbitrary and random elements of the count. It was made abundantly clear yesterday, particularly by a Member who may have...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages (Resumed). (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: All I can say is that it will depend on various factors, not least of which is a report from the Commission on Electronic Voting. I cannot give an indication of the date because it relates to that report. When we have that report there will be a further opportunity to discuss the introduction of legislation on count rules. There is no urgency. The important thing is to get it right. When we...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Report and Final Stages (Resumed). (12 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: As I stated last evening, I do not consider it necessary for instructions to be included in a statutory order. Any instructions issued will be public documents, not just confined to a party. It is the intention that most of the instructions will be in the guidelines to be issued under section 31 of the Bill. These guidelines will be available for public scrutiny. The same applies for other...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Committee Stage (Resumed). (11 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: I have indicated on a number of occasions that the question of publication of the source code will be examined later in the year having regard to the security and secrecy of the ballot. As intended, my Department will examine the count rules in the context of electronic voting and counting to provide that all the votes of elected candidates are examined in the calculation and distribution of...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Committee Stage (Resumed). (11 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: This matter has been debated over the past few months and I have not heard, even today, any substantive reasons for the inclusion, nor am I aware of any other country using such a facility. It may have been used in Brazil at some stage but I understand it is being discontinued there. This matter of the paper trail is causing concern, mostly in the US, regarding the use of some PC-based...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Committee Stage (Resumed). (11 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: It is ironic that earlier in the debate we were being accused of being too involved in the process. I do not know the answers to the questions. This is a matter for the returning officers, not the Minister. Ballot boxes will be available in ample time for the election. If I were to get involved in the micro-aspects of this, there would be justifiable reasons for making further accusations. I...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Committee Stage (Resumed). (11 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: As already indicated on Second and Committee Stages in the Dáil, the Government intends reviewing the count rules following the June polls having regard to the calculation and distribution of surpluses. Senator Finucane has taken us through operations in that regard in terms of how a different result can be obtained if surpluses are distributed in a different manner. He is quite right in...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Committee Stage (Resumed). (11 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: The amendment seeks to set aside the provisions of the Electoral (Amendment) Act 2002 which introduced that instead of deposits non-party candidates would require their nomination forms to be assented by 15 assentors in the case of a local election, 30 for a general election and 60 for election to the European Parliament. I would like to point out that provision has been made, in terms of a...

Seanad: Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2004: Committee Stage (Resumed). (11 May 2004)

Pat Gallagher: Instructions are not normally given by way of statutory order. Any instructions issued will, of course, be public documents. It is intended that most of the instructions will be in the guidelines to be issued under section 32 of the Bill. These guidelines will also be available publicly. However laudable Senator Bannon's case, his amendment is unnecessary and what he proposes would deviate...