Results 1,121-1,140 of 4,905 for speaker:Diarmuid Wilson
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: That it is confusing is my personal opinion.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: I am not happy to have them grouped.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: Can I comment?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: Before the Cathaoirleach continues, I would like to clarify a matter. I accept what my colleague, Senator Ruane, has said that Senators have had time to study the amendments. I stepped in here at short notice on behalf of my colleague, Senator Lorraine Clifford-Lee, who has had to go to another appointment. We have spoken about diversity. Surely diversity also includes confusion. If...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: Did the Cathaoirleach say amendment No. 42 or No. 32?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: More confusion.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: I reject the accusation from colleagues on the opposite side of the House of filibustering by either colleagues from my party-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: -----or other colleagues on the corresponding side. Everybody is entitled to make their contribution once is it in regard to the amendment or the section that is before the House at the time. I reject-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: -----that there was filibustering from the Opposition in the House.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: I call Senator McDowell and remind him that we are debating section 13.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: Sorry, in reference to what the Minister said, Standing Orders have always applied to-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: Yes.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: The appointment of practising barristers and practising solicitors.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: The Minister will have an opportunity to comment.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: I ask the Minister, with respect, to address his comments through the Chair.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: Before doing so, I wish to say to the Minister that I appreciate that this has been a long day. Members are entitled to make contributions under this section and he will have an opportunity to respond to their comments. I would appreciate if he would address his comments through the Chair.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: Sorry, Senator Conway. I call Senator Bacik to make her point of order.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: Section 13. It is the appointment of practising barristers.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: The amendment was withdrawn.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Jul 2018)
Diarmuid Wilson: Hear, Hear.