Results 11,341-11,360 of 11,719 for speaker:Ivana Bacik

Seanad: Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report and Final Stages (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I will not push the amendment.

Seanad: Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report and Final Stages (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 26: In page 18, line 29, after "of" to insert "annual". While it has already been debated on Committee Stage, this important amendment seeks to ensure that needs assessments are carried out annually rather than on a tri-annual basis. It is to ensure that such assessments are done on a more up-to-date basis. As we know, conditions in the housing market change quickly and...

Seanad: Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report and Final Stages (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I am grateful to the Minister of State for indicating that he will move towards a more timely system, so I will not push this amendment.

Seanad: Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report and Final Stages (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 27: In page 18, between lines 34 and 35, to insert the following: "(c) the maximum period in which an applicant for social housing or housing support shall stay in accommodation designated as emergency.". This amendment is in keeping with the Government's new strategy on homelessness under which the current maximum period for which people should stay in emergency...

Seanad: Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report and Final Stages (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I will not press the amendment at this stage, but it is a shame that Report Stage was not delayed to allow the work to be completed.

Seanad: Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report and Final Stages (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I second Senator Norris's request. I think——

Seanad: Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report and Final Stages (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 19: In page 17, line 26, to delete "may" and substitute "shall". This is simply to make mandatory the obligation on a housing authority to carry out a social housing assessment under section 20(3). I ask the Minister of State to accept that. It imposes an obligation rather than merely facilitating the housing authority. It is in the spirit of the Bill. We have debated...

Seanad: Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report and Final Stages (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I do not accept the Minister's response. It is important to place the obligation on the housing authority. I will not press the amendment at this Stage since we have debated it already.

Seanad: Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report and Final Stages (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I second the amendment. There was extensive debate on these three amendments on Committee Stage, as the Minister of Stage will recall. I think he indicated at that point that he would go back to the Parliamentary Counsel about the interplay between section 20(5) to which these amendments are proposed and section 35(5), which I think is now section 34(5). The amendments propose to allow...

Seanad: Order of Business (10 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I thank the Leader for his congratulations.

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: The Minister of State said, first, he will not accede to our request because the Revenue does not want it and, second, he wants to preserve the status quo. I do not accept those are valid reasons for rejecting the amendments, which are important and which would greatly enhance this welcome legislation. We cannot accept what the Minister of State said and I will press amendment No. 14 if the...

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: As I have said, I would like to press my amendment No. 14 in particular to a vote but I know all these amendments are similar.

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: If the Minister of State would give Members some guarantees or a rationale for this, I, like other Senators, would not press it at this stage but would reserve my position until Report Stage.

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: Why?

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I support the amendment as it applies to humanism. Like Senator Norris, I believe Senator Hannigan is correct that it is important humanism would be included. In section 3, the advancement of religion is one of the charitable purposes and the Humanist Association of Ireland certainly should also be included as a charity under that heading. The Labour Party has amendment No. 13 which would...

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I too support amendment No. 13. As I said, I would like the definition of "religion" to be extended to include humanism, but it is correct to exclude what we know as cults from this definition.

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: In view of the vote on amendment No. 9, which is based on the same principle, and the comments of the Minister of State, I do not propose to press amendment No. 14 at this point, although I reserve the right to do so on Report Stage.

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: I want to speak on this group of amendments. My amendment is No. 14, but clearly amendments Nos. 9, 11, 14, 15 and 16 all seek to do the same thing, which is to place as one of the charitable purposes in section 3(10) the advancement or promotion of human rights. It is an important principle that a purpose that is of benefit to the community should include the advancement of human rights....

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: Will the Minister of State explain why he is leaving this proposal out, given that there is such broad support for it with five different amendments all purporting to do the same? Will he justify why he is not accepting this amendment?

Seanad: Charities Bill 2007: Committee Stage (4 Dec 2008)

Ivana Bacik: Like so many others I have welcomed this Bill. As I pointed out on Second Stage, it is much needed and the charitable sector does require regulation. For far too long, there has been inadequate regulation. The Revenue had to step in and take over a role for which it was not designed. As Senator Buttimer stated, most of the Bill's provisions are supported by the Opposition. This is an...