Results 10,681-10,700 of 11,695 for speaker:Ivana Bacik

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 11: In page 11, line 26, after "concerned" to insert the following: ", for example DNA evidence or an admission by the person concerned". This is the first amendment dealing with Part 3, which in some ways makes the most significant departure from current criminal procedure, which creates the new exceptions to the rule against double jeopardy. I stated already on...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: As I said, I am not wedded to the precise wording proposed, the wording used by the criminal law review group, but I accept that it was not drafting legislation. It gave these two examples of the specific evidence that might constitute new and compelling evidence. As the Minister acknowledged, it is likely that evidence on the basis of which acquittals will be reopened will include DNA...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 12: In page 12, line 38, after "Court" to insert the following: "if satisfied that the Director has given the person concerned all reasonable notice to facilitate his or her appearance and". I tabled two of these three amendments on Committee Stage and the Minister pointed out that I had omitted one related amendment. Therefore I tabled a third, but they are all,...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I thank the Minister for his reply. I should have said the amendments relate to sections 8 and 9, applications for retrial and, section 23 which deals with prejudice prosecution appeals. I take the Minister's point that where a person who is aware the order has been made purposely absents himself or herself the subsection will allow the court to proceed to hear and determine the application...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 2: In page 6, line 36, after "person," to insert the following: "or any offence under the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997". We had a full debate on the amendment on Committee Stage. The Minister might recall - certainly my notes indicate - that he accepted in principle the merit of the amendment, which proposes to extend the type of offence to which the...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I am grateful to the Minister for indicating his acceptance of the principle of the amendment and also for his indication that he will introduce an amendment in similar terms in the other House. However, I am disappointed that he could not have had the amendment ready for Report Stage in this House, given that it has been fully debated in this House. I also believe that my amendment has the...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I am grateful to the Minister for accepting the principle of amendment No. 4 on Committee Stage and tabling his own amendment. On Committee Stage I raised the issue of the time gap between the injury caused and the death of the victim and that the family would be able to speak about the impact on the relative before his or her death. It may only arise in a small number of cases but it is an...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 5: In page 8, between lines 26 and 27, to insert the following: "(4) Where a person in respect of whom an offence has been committed, or a family member of that person, proposes to give evidence under subsection (3) orally rather than in writing, it shall not be necessary for the court to give any particular direction or warning to that person in respect of his or her...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: This amendment would not rule out a discretionary warning by a judge. It is an indication that it is not necessary for a court to give a warning. It is inappropriate that there should be any sense that victims' families would be singled out in this way.

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 7: In page 10, between lines 11 and 12, to insert the following: "(7) This section is without prejudice to the power of a court to receive evidence regarding the effect of an offence, other than an offence to which this section applies, on the person in respect of whom the offence was committed.". This amendment seeks to make clear that a court has a general power to...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 8: In page 10, line 48, after "competent" to insert "and suitably trained". This amendment seeks to add an extra layer of qualification to the intermediary provided for in section 6 which inserts a new section 5A into the 1993 Act which allows questions be put to a child or person with a mental disorder through an intermediary who in a court's opinion is competent to act...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I thank the Minister for his reply. There is anecdotal evidence of some issues in the past but, clearly, this is not a matter on which there is hard and fast evidence. It is important that the court would have some guidance on what constitutes competence, and yet I have not been specific in the amendment in such a way that would tie the hands of the court either. The wording is appropriate.

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 9: In page 10, after line 48, to insert the following: 7.—In an application under this section the court may make such order as it sees fit to facilitate legal representation of a person in respect of whom an offence has been committed or a family member as appropriate, where it is appropriate to do so.". This amendment proposes to give power to the court to make an...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I move amendment No. 10: In page 11, line 11, to delete "Court of Criminal Appeal" and substitute "Supreme Court". We had a full debate on the merits of the Court of Criminal Appeal versus the Supreme Court. I will not go back over it except to state that my party followed the recommendations of the balance in the criminal law expert review group, which had recommended the Supreme Court be...

Seanad: Order of Business (8 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I ask the Leader for a debate on domestic violence in light of the fact that we are nearly at the end of Women's Aid's 16 Days Campaign to highlight the need to eliminate violence against women. We need a debate in this House on the way in which legislation, in particular, could be amended to ensure greater protection for victims of domestic violence and to ensure also greater applicability...

Seanad: Order of Business (4 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: It is about communication of change.

Seanad: Order of Business (4 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I express to the Leader the concern of the Labour Party group at the way in which business in this House was ordered or, more accurately, disordered this week. We have had a difficult week in terms of the ordering of business. I am not suggesting all the responsibility for that lies with the Leader but there have been quite a number of piecemeal, last minute and unilateral changes to the...

Seanad: Report by Commission of Investigation into Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin: Statements (3 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I welcome the publication of the Murphy report, which at last shines a light into a dark corner of our recent history. The report examined the period between 1975 and 2004 and its recommendations refer to ongoing issues of which we must take account. I commend Ms Justice Yvonne Murphy and her commission on the report's excellence and clarity of language. I am glad we have the opportunity...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (2 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I thank the Minister for clarifying that the person will be at liberty pending the hearing of an application under section 8. I understood him to state that prior to section 16 being brought into operation, the Director of Public Prosecutions must have already formed a view on the existence of new and compelling evidence. However, that is not clear from the wording of the section. I do not...

Seanad: Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (2 Dec 2009)

Ivana Bacik: I said the reason I opposed the section was that I was not clear about the purpose. The Minister clarified that and I will table an amendment on Report Stage. I am grateful to him. The Minister said that gardaí would have to put it to the acquitted person. I do not believe he is requiring that because clearly the gardaí may apply but they do not have to do so.