Results 9,181-9,200 of 10,035 for speaker:Martin Cullen
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: That is the Deputy's view; it is not my view.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: The Deputy is raising the temperature straight away. He knows as well as I do the finds on that route are minor. They have not found anything of significance.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: The Deputy is raising the temperature.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: No.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: We will deal with them.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: The evidence does not say that.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: Six routes have been examined.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: The Deputy should be fair and balanced. Six routes have been examined.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: No, but they are not of the significance that has been presented.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: No, I do not, but the point is that we should stand back and see. That is all I am saying. I am only trying to be helpful. The indications are that what people thought would be found on the Hill of Taraââ
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: Am I not allowed to make a point on Second Stage? I do not wish to argue with the Deputy because he is right. I am concerned that before we come to any conclusion on the M3 route, we should all stand back and see what is the case. There was an expectation that considerable finds would be discovered on the Hill of Tara. I understand that is not the case, which is not to say there are not...
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: That is not true.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: I took direct adviceââ
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: ââthat caused it to be changed.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: That puts me in a no-win situation.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: I finished it. Why?
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: The Deputy should be fair.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: May I raise a point of order?
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: I was not trying to be argumentative.
- National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage. (17 Jun 2004)
Martin Cullen: It is some â¬6 million plus.