Results 8,241-8,260 of 20,765 for speaker:Alan Kelly

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: For clarity, and after this Deputy Connolly can resume, we have 28 cases, plus two potential cases and one closed case in terms of CervicalCheck.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Are they non-screening services?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Are they related to cervical cancer?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: For total clarity, are there more cases in terms of the other screening programmes?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Yes.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: How many cases?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Are there 18 active claims, four closed claims-----

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: I will clarify the numbers in order to prevent confusion. The last figures relate to bowel cases.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Are there 18 active claims, five closed claims and three potential claims?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Are those cases outside of the actual screening?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Does Mr. Breen have more figures?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Are the figures for outside of the screening process?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: In fairness, Mr. Breen has given figures for inside and outside the screening programmes.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Is that it?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: I call Deputy Connolly.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: I ask Mr. Breen to forward his tabular statement with the date to the committee so that we can distribute it.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: I apologise to Deputy Connolly for interrupting her questions but I believe that last exchange has been useful.

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: Why did the HSE not take up Mr. Gleeson's request?

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: There are two points on which I seek clarification from Mr. McCallion and Mr. Connaghan. Mr. Connaghan said he would like to consider Mr. Gleeson's offer of access. How, in the name of God, did he not know about it before today? This is the biggest health scandal in decades and Dr. Scally has come out and criticised the HSE about access. Surely, it was fed up the line that the programme...

Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)

Alan Kelly: For the public, the witnesses are all on the same team and Mr. Connaghan is thanking Mr. Gleeson in front of the whole country for a suggestion that seems glaringly obvious to most of us - giving access to information. Yesterday the Minister for Health called the witnesses "pathetic", but Mr. Connaghan was not even told that this had been offered. He really needs to sit down and have a chat...