Results 8,221-8,240 of 20,758 for speaker:Alan Kelly
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Mr. McCallion is not answering two of my questions. Has the 209 figure increased and, if so, by how much? Does the HSE expect it to increase even further? Are there cases where women ring in but there is no doctor to ring them back?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: What is the number now?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Given that Limerick is the epicentre of this, may I make a suggestion to Mr. McCallion? It is one that his own staff are telling him and of which he was probably made aware in the past 24 hours when he visited Limerick yesterday and returned with Mr. Gleeson to prepare for today. There should be a doctor there. The staff in Limerick need a doctor who can deal with these cases.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Well-----
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: I will be gone in 20 minutes. I can do it for that time, though.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Okay.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Please do. I have to go.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Are they part of the CervicalCheck programme?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Sorry, Deputy Connolly, but I will give you back time. Has the State Claims Agency the numbers for the other screening programmes?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Such information would help us to close that out.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: What about the other screening programmes?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Mr. Breen told us there are 28 cases, two potential claims and one closed case.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: What are the figures for BreastCheck?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: For clarity, and after this Deputy Connolly can resume, we have 28 cases, plus two potential cases and one closed case in terms of CervicalCheck.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Are they non-screening services?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Are they related to cervical cancer?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: For total clarity, are there more cases in terms of the other screening programmes?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Yes.
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: How many cases?
- Public Accounts Committee: Implications of CervicalCheck Revelations (Resumed) (14 Jun 2018)
Alan Kelly: Are there 18 active claims, four closed claims-----