Results 6,661-6,680 of 10,460 for speaker:Gerry Horkan
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: Sorry, Senator Norris-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: I have tried to facilitate the debate.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: I can understand the level of frustration the Minister must be experiencing.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: I have been providing good order. If the Minister feels I have not, I am sorry. However, I am not aware if anyone else is of his view.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: Amendment No. 96-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: I am also trying to be helpful. In the context of section 48, amendment No. 96 states, "In page 32, to delete lines 12 to 17." Amendment No. 97, a Government amendment, states-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: Yes, but there is an asterisk beside it which means that is also a Government amendment. Perhaps one of you copied the other or maybe it is a case of great minds think alike.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: I have tried to assist everybody as much as possible.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: As yours.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: The asterisks indicates that they are also Government amendments.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: They are.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: We have not reached section 49 . We are still on amendment No. 85b, which relates to section 39. Has the Senator concluded?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: It is amendment No. 85b.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: Amendment No. 85a was defeated on the previous occasion. We are dealing with amendment No. 85b and we have been doing so since 6.20 p.m. or thereabouts.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: We are on section 39 and not sections 48 and 49, although there is relevance.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: Senators Norris and Conway should address their remarks through the Chair please.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (22 Jan 2019)
Gerry Horkan: The Senator will have the opportunity to do so when we will come to discuss the amendments to sections 48 and 49. We are still discussing amendment No. 85b.
- Seanad: Finance (African Development (Bank and Fund) and Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2018: Committee and Remaining Stages (20 Dec 2018)
Gerry Horkan: We had a Second Stage debate on this on Tuesday. I thank the Minister of State and all his officials. It is a positive step for Ireland to be involved with this and I hope it will benefit the African continent and Ireland's involvement there. It is a two-way relationship and Ireland has a very strong history in helping and being involved with the African continent. I hope this will...
- Seanad: Business of Seanad (20 Dec 2018)
Gerry Horkan: To be fair, it was the Leader's objection to the amendment to the Order of Business that caused most of the-----
- Seanad: Business of Seanad (20 Dec 2018)
Gerry Horkan: It is correct to say the voting on the Order of Business required because of the objection to the amendment of the Order of Business caused a significant chunk of the delay that meant we did not finish the Order of Business by 12.45 p.m. We only started business at 1.15 p.m., meaning we were delayed by half an hour.