Results 6,141-6,160 of 20,382 for speaker:Brian Stanley
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: So it is up to half.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: Ms McPhillips said there is co-operation with the authorities in Britain and we know Britain does not have a good policy in regard to the former Prime Minister wanting this scheme of sending people to Rwanda. We do not want to go there but, obviously, Brexit has had an impact here. Ms McPhillips said there is a high level of co-operation with the authorities in Britain on this. Is there...
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: In regard to the ports in the North, what level of co-operation is there?
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: What level of co-operation is there with ports in the North? In other words, with the port authorities or the PSNI.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: Would the PSNI be doing similar work at Belfast Airport as An Garda Síochána does at Cork Airport?
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: I know that. We do not want a hard border.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: I am just trying to understand how it works.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: I know. I do not expect Ms McPhillips to do so. I am just trying to understand how the system works. The point where people come to the immigration centre and are fingerprinted, etc., is really the checkpoint after which one can start to process.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: I wanted to figure out how it works. Is the Department making a concerted effort for those who are awaiting a decision for three, four or five years, even though it might be a second-round decision? If people have a genuine case, it is important that we try to help them. The increase in staff is to be welcomed. We have highlighted this. It will more than double the current figures. When...
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: Is that realistic?
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: Is it the case that the Department has approximately 300 staff at present?
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: Deputy, please treat the witness with respect.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: Deputy-----
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: Be careful, Deputy. You are dealing with specific cases.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: Deputy, you might let in the witness.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: Or any cases in a general way.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: I ask the Deputy not to be specific.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: A quick question, Deputy.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: I ask the Deputy to be careful about being specific. She may continue but briefly.
- Public Accounts Committee: Appropriation Accounts 2021
Vote 24 – Justice (25 May 2023) Brian Stanley: I thank Ms McPhillips. Where red flags are raised or a senior official in the Department does not get answers to correspondence on a particular scheme, and I am not mentioning any scheme, why would that scheme be allowed to continue and to take in another huge number of investments? Why would that happen?