Results 6,041-6,060 of 13,254 for speaker:Seán Sherlock

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Spent Convictions (5 Feb 2019)

Seán Sherlock: 273. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if each person that has a spent conviction under the Criminal Justice (Spent Convictions and Certain Disclosures) Act 2016, has had their record dealt with electronically in such a way as to ensure that systems such as PULSE do not militate against them. [5155/19]

Written Answers — Department of Health: HSE Reports (5 Feb 2019)

Seán Sherlock: 397. To ask the Minister for Health if a publication (details supplied) was funded by the HSE or from a hospital group budget and if so, the full cost of the publication from marketing and distribution costs, including distribution through all media formats including press. [5346/19]

Written Answers — Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport: Fáilte Ireland (5 Feb 2019)

Seán Sherlock: 545. To ask the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport if Fáilte Ireland’s website will be updated to reflect more accurately tourism products and offerings in north County Cork region. [4972/19]

Written Answers — Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht: Departmental Funding (31 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: 262. To ask the Minister for Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the conditions that have been placed on further funding to Cork City Council for a centre (details supplied). [4813/19]

Juvenile Crime: Motion [Private Members] (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: I rise to support the motion. On a positive note, I acknowledge some of the changes under way in light of recent reports on the handling of specific cases. We must acknowledge in a positive light the good work the Garda youth diversion office does. We believe strongly that one of the greatest interventions that could be made regarding youth diversion is at the community level. I tabled a...

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Brexit Issues (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: 50. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the contingency and scenario planning his Department is undertaking in respect of policing and security matters from a North-South and east-west perspective in the event of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU without a negotiated settlement. [4390/19]

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: International Terrorism (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: 55. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality his views on alleged terrorist activities here by a group (details supplied) or sympathisers of same that are using financial institutions for the purposes of channelling funds to Syria; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4393/19]

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Brexit Issues (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: 67. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality his plans in place to police the Border in the event of a hard Brexit. [4392/19]

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Crime Levels (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: 71. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 277 of 13 November 2018, if he is satisfied that the system for recording the number of knife crimes is accurate; and if so, the number of knife crimes recorded in each of the years 2016 to 2018 and to date in 2019, in tabular form. [4389/19]

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Commission on the Future of Policing Reports (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: 72. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the progress being made on the implementation of recommendations in the policing commission report in respect of obligations to co-operate with the HSE and Tusla; and if legislation and protocols have been drafted in this regard. [4391/19]

Committee on Public Petitions: Decisions on Public Petitions Received (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: The first petition for consideration is Petition No. P00023/18. It is proposed that we forward a copy of the response from the Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation to the petitioner and close the petition. Is that agreed? Agreed. The next petition for consideration is Petition No. P00046/18. It is proposed that we correspond with the Department of Justice and Equality...

Committee on Public Petitions: Decisions on Public Petitions Received (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: It is the view of the committee that we should keep the petition open as it is a live issue which mainly affects women. I am happy to await the update from the Department. It would be appropriate for the committee to keep the petition open on that basis. I think we are agreed on that. I acknowledge the visitors in the Public Gallery who I understand may be guests of Deputy Brendan Ryan. ...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Children and Youth Affairs: Oberstown Children Detention Campus Operational Review Report: Discussion (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: I am delighted the witnesses are here today because this has given us much clarity and has probably answered some of the questions we had on the processes undertaken. The witnesses should know that neither our committee nor I have had access to or seen the report.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Children and Youth Affairs: Oberstown Children Detention Campus Operational Review Report: Discussion (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: This committee is flying blind. We had a sense from the Minister's interaction with us prior to Christmas that the HIQA recommendations were being worked through. I certainly had the impression from that interaction with her that that was as a result of work that had flowed from the witnesses report. My questions are about the terms of reference. We have been given an impression that...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Children and Youth Affairs: Oberstown Children Detention Campus Operational Review Report: Discussion (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: In response to a question from Deputy Rabbitte at the last committee meeting, the Minister stated: The report was written and conclusions, observations and recommendations were made. I answered Deputy Rabbitte's question about observations made that were outside the terms of reference and which went into policy issues. It was not provided for Oberstown House for people to review. People...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Children and Youth Affairs: Oberstown Children Detention Campus Operational Review Report: Discussion (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: On that basis, do the witnesses see any impediment, in the public interest, to this report coming into full public view?

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Children and Youth Affairs: Oberstown Children Detention Campus Operational Review Report: Discussion (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: Again, I will quote from my own question to the Minister at our last committee meeting about this. I asked her "Was the process designed in such a way that if findings were made against persons or the entity, there would be a right of reply?" The Minister replied: Yes. They were asked to provide the report for the people concerned before there was a final report. That is what I am...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Children and Youth Affairs: Oberstown Children Detention Campus Operational Review Report: Discussion (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: The Minister did say following that-----

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Children and Youth Affairs: Oberstown Children Detention Campus Operational Review Report: Discussion (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: The Minister said: The Oberstown centre envisaged that the visit would take place before the reviewers finalised the report - that was included in the terms of reference - in order that comments could be taken into account in the final version of the report. However, the reviewers maintain that it would not have been possible to provide feedback until the final report had been completed....

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Children and Youth Affairs: Oberstown Children Detention Campus Operational Review Report: Discussion (30 Jan 2019)

Seán Sherlock: Does Professor Hardwick think the board of Oberstown has nothing to fear from the publication of the report?