Results 521-540 of 861 for speaker:Joe Sherlock
- Interpretation Bill 2000: From the Seanad (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: Amendments Nos. 12 to 15, inclusive are related to amendment No.11 and these will be discussed together by agreement.
- Interpretation Bill 2000: From the Seanad (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: Amendments Nos. 17 and 19 are related to amendment No. 16 and these shall be discussed together by agreement.
- Interpretation Bill 2000: From the Seanad (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: Amendments Nos. 23, 24 and 25 are related and will be discussed together by agreement.
- Interpretation Bill 2000: From the Seanad (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: Seanad amendment No. 31 is related to Seanad amendment No. 30 and they may be discussed together, by agreement. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Interpretation Bill 2000: From the Seanad (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: Seanad amendments Nos. 34 to 36, inclusive, are related to Seanad amendment No. 33 and they may be discussed together, by agreement. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Interpretation Bill 2000: From the Seanad (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: A note will be sent to the Seanad acquainting it accordingly.
- Railway Safety Bill 2001: Motion to Recommit. (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: The Minister for Transport has indicated his intention to move to recommit the Bill in its entirety and on the assumption that his motion will be agreed by the House, the accompanying brief has been prepared following procedure for Committee Stage. For that reason, amendments Nos. 1 and 2 on the published list, the amendments to the Long Title, shall be dealt with last.
- Railway Safety Bill 2001: Motion to Recommit. (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: The Minister has made known his intention to recommit. Will Deputy Shortall speak to it?
- Railway Safety Bill 2001: Motion to Recommit. (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: That is correct.
- Railway Safety Bill 2001: Motion to Recommit. (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: I have allowed considerable latitude.
- Railway Safety Bill 2001: Motion to Recommit. (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: A contentious matter has arisen and I am showing latitude. Deputy Shortall may proceed if she wishes.
- Railway Safety Bill 2001: Report Stage. (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: I wish to inform the House that arising from the decision to recommit the entire Bill, amendments Nos. 1 and 2 on the published list, being amendments to the Long Title, will be dealt with at last. As is standard procedure on Committee Stage, we will, therefore, commence consideration of the Bill at section 1, postponing consideration of those amendments until all other amendments and...
- Railway Safety Bill 2001: Report Stage. (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: Amendments No. 5, Nos. 42 to 54, inclusive, No. 56, Nos. 58 to 75, inclusive, Nos. 77 to 81, inclusive, Nos. 88 to 90, inclusive, and Nos. 104 and 147 are related and will be discussed together. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Railway Safety Bill 2001: Report Stage. (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: Amendments Nos. 7, 8 and 111 are related and may be discussed together.
- Order of Business. (5 Oct 2005)
Joe Sherlock: When is it proposed to publish the medical practitioners Bill? We have heard adverse comments about the new system, which is described as the South Doc system.
- Written Answers — Overseas Missions: Overseas Missions (29 Sep 2005)
Joe Sherlock: Question 52: To ask the Minister for Defence if he has brought to Cabinet proposals for the participation of Irish troops in EU rapid-reaction forces; the legislative changes that are required to facilitate this; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25882/05]
- Defence Forces Inquiry. (29 Sep 2005)
Joe Sherlock: Question 2: To ask the Minister for Defence his plans to conduct an investigation into the death of a person (details supplied) six years ago; if he is satisfied with the open verdict returned by an inquest in Donegal into this person's death; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26049/05]
- Defence Forces Inquiry. (29 Sep 2005)
Joe Sherlock: I join the Minister and the other speaker in extending sympathy to Mrs. Barrett and the family on the death of Kevin Barrett. I am disappointed by the Minister's response as he is well aware of the problem. Mrs. Barrett was told by the army that her son died as result of an accident and there were many unanswered questions. The Minister now proposes to have an investigation because the family...
- Defence Forces Inquiry. (29 Sep 2005)
Joe Sherlock: The coroner, Dr. John Gannon, said Private Barrett died as a result of a discharge from an Army weapon. Why did it take so long to meet this lady to consider or listen to what she had to say on the matter? When does the Minister propose to meet this person and does he hope to set up the investigation immediately following the meeting?
- Defence Forces Inquiry. (29 Sep 2005)
Joe Sherlock: This is a serious matter. The Barrett legal team was not given the Army documentation. Will this documentation be given to the legal team?