Results 5,341-5,360 of 18,728 for speaker:Michael McDowell

Written Answers — Crime Levels: Crime Levels (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: Following the submission to me in 2004 of a report and recommendations by an expert group on crime statistics, I decided that the compilation and publication of crime statistics should be taken over by the Central Statistics Office, as the national statistical agency, from the Garda Síochána. The Garda Síochána Act 2005 consequently makes provision for this and the CSO has established a...

Written Answers — Residency Permits: Residency Permits (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: As outlined in my response to Parliamentary Question No. 221 of the 27th February 2007, the person concerned must contact the Immigration Division of my Department. To date the Immigration Division has no record of having received any correspondence from the person referred to by the Deputy. If and when the documentation is received, the application will be processed.

Written Answers — Garda Deployment: Garda Deployment (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: I propose to take Questions Nos. 183 and 184 together. I have been informed by the Garda authorities, who are responsible for the detailed allocation of resources, including personnel, that the personnel strength (all ranks) of An Garda Síochána increased to a record 13,178 following the attestation of 273 new members on Wednesday 14 March, 2007. This compares with a total strength of...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: I wish to refer the Deputy to my reply to PQ No. 201 which refers to same and which was answered 20 March, 2007. The position remains the same. The person concerned, a Nigerian national, arrived in the State on 28 April, 2003 and applied for asylum. Her application was refused following consideration of the case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner on 12 February, 2004...

Written Answers — Visa Applications: Visa Applications (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: The application referred to by the Deputy was received in the Visa Office on 13th March 2007. I am pleased to inform the Deputy that the visa application in question was approved on 16th March 2007.

Written Answers — Visa Applications: Visa Applications (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: I understand from the Immigration Division of my Department that the person concerned has recently been granted permission to remain in the State and that the passport has been returned.

Written Answers — Crime Prevention: Crime Prevention (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: The Garda Bureau of Fraud Investigation is the specialist unit within An Garda Síochána with national responsibility for the investigation of fraud-related crime. The Bureau has carried out a number of investigations in relation to complaints made by insurance companies over the years. These investigations have resulted in a number of successful prosecutions. I am informed by the Garda...

Written Answers — Public Service Contracts: Public Service Contracts (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: The detailed information required by the Deputy is not readily available in the format requested. As the Deputy will appreciate, having regard to the breadth of activities undertaken by my Department and by the agencies under its aegis, the extent of the procurement activity is necessarily very extensive, running perhaps to several hundred procurement instances in the period in question. In...

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: One must remember that jurors are judges of fact. While it is true they take an oath and are obliged to act collectively, nonetheless they are judges of fact in a particular case. Irish law gives jurors a function in assessing damages in certain cases such as assault, fraud and other related matters to avoid the scenario in which although one person establishes the facts of a case and...

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: In such circumstances, a judge might be quite sympathetic to a newspaper. Although he or she might have disagreed with the jury's decision, as it decided there was a defamation the judge would proceed to award damages. Such a judge might believe a matter to be comparatively trivial although the jury might have decided that in the circumstances, it was not trivial. In a defamation action,...

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: Therefore, in this context, direction in respect of damages means the legal basis on which jurors are to proceed. This is important because jurors must be told they cannot go mad and cannot simply choose any old figure, thereby bankrupting the newspaper and teaching it a lesson.

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: Jurors cannot be so informed because a jury's function is not to bankrupt a newspaper but to compensate the plaintiff. Jurors must have their function explained to them. When juries assessed damages in personal injuries matters, a doctrine applied, and in so far as I am aware still applies, namely, there are certain sums of money for general damages that should not be exceeded in respect of...

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: Yes, I am talking about general directions. The judge will be able to bring the jury's mind to matters which will help members make a judgment which will not be overturned on appeal. If an accusation that Senator Norris took a bribe appears in a newspaper——

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: If such an accusation that Senator Norris took a bribe is made seriously——

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: Exactly. Such an accusation must be dealt with more seriously than an idiot store detective challenging one in the wrong as one leaves a supermarket. Different graduations of seriousness exist. One may experience ten minutes of embarrassment and one's neighbours may state, "Did you see Norris? He was stopped coming out of such-and-such a shop." That may be bad but it is completely...

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: No, not this. They were lobbying for the total abolition of the jury damages.

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: I tried to be reasonable.

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: As a Joycean scholar——

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: ——the Senator's insistence on accessible and understandable language astounds me.

Seanad: Defamation Bill 2006: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Mar 2007)

Michael McDowell: As I understand it, it has always been the rule, except in defamation cases, that juries should be given directions as to all of their functions, including the assessment of damages. When personal injury cases were decided by juries, it was the case that they were given directions by the courts how they should approach the issue of awarding damages. I am trying to achieve rationality in this...