Results 5,181-5,200 of 13,258 for speaker:Pat Gallagher
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Deputies, please. The Minister would have had an opportunity had Standing Order-----
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: The Minister would have had an opportunity, and I am sure he is disappointed he will not have that opportunity, had Standing Order 68 not been invoked. The Minister will have an opportunity on Fifth Stage.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: There is nothing further.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: I see that-----
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: I am going to adjourn.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Deputies, please.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Sorry-----
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Deputy Bailey-----
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Will the Deputies claiming a division, please, rise?
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: As fewer than ten Members have risen, I declare the question carried. In accordance with Standing Order 70, the names of the Deputies dissenting will be recorded in the Journal of the Proceedings of the Dáil.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Will the Deputies claiming a division, please, rise?
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: As fewer than ten Members have risen, I declare the question carried. In accordance with Standing Order 70, the names of the Deputies dissenting will be recorded in the Journal of the Proceedings of the Dáil.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: As the amendment has already been discussed, there will be no further debate on it.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Unfortunately, Standing Orders do not allow for that. Amendments Nos. 4 to 21, inclusive, and 28 were discussed together.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: The Deputy cannot speak to the amendment.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: It is in accordance with Standing Orders. The amendment has already been discussed.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: He will have to find another way to respond to them. It might be appropriate, but it is not permissible.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: The question is, "That the question on amendment No. 4 be now put." To be clear, it is not on amendment No. 4 itself. The question has been challenged. Will the Deputies claiming a division please rise?
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: No. Let me be very clear-----
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: -----so that there is no ambiguity. We have been here all evening, both myself and the Deputies who have been in the House, so I ask those who have come in for the vote to offer the courtesy of listening, please. Deputy Catherine Murphy made a proposal under Standing Order 68. Standing Order 68 gives the right to any Deputy to propose that the question be put. After that, there is no...