Results 5,141-5,160 of 13,210 for speaker:Pat Gallagher
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Will the Deputies claiming a division, please, rise?
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: As fewer than ten Members have risen, I declare the question carried. In accordance with Standing Order 70, the names of the Deputies dissenting will be recorded in the Journal of the Proceedings of the Dáil.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Will the Deputies claiming a division, please, rise?
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: As fewer than ten Members have risen, I declare the question carried. In accordance with Standing Order 70, the names of the Deputies dissenting will be recorded in the Journal of the Proceedings of the Dáil.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: As the amendment has already been discussed, there will be no further debate on it.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Unfortunately, Standing Orders do not allow for that. Amendments Nos. 4 to 21, inclusive, and 28 were discussed together.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: The Deputy cannot speak to the amendment.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: It is in accordance with Standing Orders. The amendment has already been discussed.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: He will have to find another way to respond to them. It might be appropriate, but it is not permissible.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: The question is, "That the question on amendment No. 4 be now put." To be clear, it is not on amendment No. 4 itself. The question has been challenged. Will the Deputies claiming a division please rise?
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: No. Let me be very clear-----
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: -----so that there is no ambiguity. We have been here all evening, both myself and the Deputies who have been in the House, so I ask those who have come in for the vote to offer the courtesy of listening, please. Deputy Catherine Murphy made a proposal under Standing Order 68. Standing Order 68 gives the right to any Deputy to propose that the question be put. After that, there is no...
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: As fewer than-----
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: The Deputy cannot ask any questions. He cannot even stand while the Chair is on his feet.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Deputies cannot challenge the Chair in that manner.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: This is very clear. I am clear in my mind, and I put it to the Deputies that when the Chair is on his feet, no one should challenge.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: I cannot make it any simpler. As fewer than ten Members have risen, I declare the question carried. In accordance with Standing Order 70, the names of the Deputies dissenting will be recorded in the Journal of the Proceedings of the Dáil.
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: No, there is no point. We are not debating-----
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: Listen-----
- Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (9 May 2018)
Pat Gallagher: The Deputy is in the House long enough to understand that on the recommital we were debating amendments Nos. 4 to 21, inclusive, and No. 28. We debated them all together. We move on to the question on amendment No. 4.