Results 481-500 of 12,886 for speaker:Paul Coghlan
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I ruled in accordance with Standing Orders.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: We do not want this to go on.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: It is to the Senator, I accept that.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: The Senator is entitled to his view, for what it is worth. I thank the Senator. We will now hear from Senator Bacik.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: It is a matter for decision by the House.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I am advised that it is a matter for decision by the House and I accept that.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: It is not a matter for any individual Senator. The Senator should be respectful.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I have a proposal.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I did not say that the Senator had.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: Senator Conway is opposing.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: It is a decision of the House.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: The Senator has been given a ruling by me. It is a decision by the House.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: We will give the Senator the number in a minute. Senator Craughwell has proposed to recommit. Has it been seconded?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: And it has been objected to strongly by Senator Conway. Senator McFadden has seconded the objection.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: That is correct. I am going to put the proposal to the House.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: No, the vote on the recommital of amendment No. 7 is defeated.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: I will speak on that in a minute and then the Senator can decide. I welcome the Minister back to the Chamber. We are back to Report Stage. I have already moved amendment No. 7. Will Senators please pay attention? We will have no repetition of what happened earlier. Amendment Nos 7 to 12, inclusive, are related; amendment Nos 8 and 9 are physical alternatives to amendment No. 7, which...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: The Senator wants to separate them. Is that what the Members wish?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: We generally seek the assent of Members.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (Resumed) (26 Nov 2019)
Paul Coghlan: We will not do that.