Results 32,281-32,300 of 32,983 for speaker:Paschal Donohoe

Seanad: Order of Business. (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: Some of the points in the speech would be investigated by the Garda and for those lines to be blurred is a profound mistake. I say this on behalf of the individual gardaí who had to rush to a gangland murder on Friday night and who stand outside head shops all over Dublin city. Such rank and file members are the people who will suffer from such statements and a line was crossed yesterday...

Seanad: Order of Business. (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: Yes.

Seanad: Smarter Travel Initiative: Motion (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I move amendment No. 1: To delete all words after "Seanad Éireann" and substitute the following: "notes that: the capital city still does not have a high speed integrated and sustainable public transport system to entice commuters from their cars to reliable public transport; Dublin Bus is taking more buses off the road and reducing routes, therefore cutting services to local communities;...

Seanad: Smarter Travel Initiative: Motion (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I did not say that. I made a point of asking the Minister of State to deliver-----

Seanad: Smarter Travel Initiative: Motion (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: -----the same service.

Seanad: Smarter Travel Initiative: Motion (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I did not say "barmy".

Seanad: Smarter Travel Initiative: Motion (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I asked how one could deliver the same service with fewer buses given that the funding to Dublin Bus has doubled. The Minister of State should answer this question. The money Dublin Bus has received since 2000 has doubled from €40 million to €80 million.

Seanad: Smarter Travel Initiative: Motion (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: He is misquoting me. I am taking this as an opportunity to put my question to him again. If he will not answer a point I did not make, then he might answer a point I did.

Seanad: Smarter Travel Initiative: Motion (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: No, we have not advocated that.

Seanad: Smarter Travel Initiative: Motion (28 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: Yes.

Seanad: Order of Business. (27 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I call for a debate on a subject that could overshadow many of the themes we are discussing today. I refer to events in Greece on Friday, when a small member state of the European Union announced to the international markets that it believed it would not be able to meet its expenditure and asked member states to support it in an act of solidarity. That event will change the path and choices...

Seanad: Internet Filtering Systems. (22 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I thank the Minister for taking this Adjournment matter. It relates to Government thinking on dealing with the issue of illegal file sharing across the Internet. There was some publicity about that in recent weeks in regard to a freedom of information request to the Government through an organisation called Digital Rights Ireland. It was looking to establish Government policy on how it...

Seanad: Internet Filtering Systems. (22 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: Everyone is supportive of any measure that can be taken to deal with the evil of child pornography and its distribution on the Internet. The consequences of a course of action that could be taken may be more far-reaching and profound than is understood. The response of the Minister of State concerns the discussions taking place - referred to in the first part of my submission - but does not...

Seanad: Order of Business. (21 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I agree with Senator Quinn's call for a debate on the parts of the economy which are doing well. In recent weeks, I visited companies in my locality which work in digital media and arts. Ireland has companies which are world-leading in these areas and which show the agility, spirit and degree of adventure to which we aspire our wider economy to share. These companies are not recognised on...

Seanad: Property Services (Regulation) Bill 2009: Committee Stage. (21 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I have one question for the Minister. The original Bill referred to the price which a willing and not-anxious tenant would be seeking to pay. The amendment the Minister has before the House removes that description from the Bill. Will he say why that is the case? It appears to me that to say somebody was willing but not anxious would put a framework in place within which a proper price...

Seanad: Property Services (Regulation) Bill 2009: Committee Stage. (21 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: The Minister has provided that the membership of the authority will include persons who represent the providers of property services. One of the welcome dimensions of the Bill is that it seeks to rebalance matters and give priority to people who receive property services or are clients of property service providers. Will the Minister consider including in the authority not only people who...

Seanad: Property Services (Regulation) Bill 2009: Committee Stage. (21 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: The original section of the Bill was not that silent about the membership of the authority. It made clear those people would have knowledge or experience in matters relevant to functions of the authority and referred to the need for balance. I am concerned the amendment specifies in greater detail who these people should be. The only specific reference in the amendment is to...

Seanad: Property Services (Regulation) Bill 2009: Committee Stage. (21 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I thank Senator Bacik for her support on that point. The Minister in his response referred to the point about the number of three. This was not the substantive point I was looking to make and Senator Bacik has pointed out a flaw. I suggest any amendment of this section should be more specific about the people who should be members of the authority. Why is the amendment only dealing with...

Seanad: Property Services (Regulation) Bill 2009: Committee Stage. (21 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: I was not suggesting the Minister choose a man or woman off the street. I am sure he knows that is not the point I was making. I was merely making the observation, which is a valid and pertinent one given the industry in question, that there is a need to ensure consumer interests are advocated on the board of the authority. The amendment before us could be regressive in stipulating...

Seanad: Property Services (Regulation) Bill 2009: Committee Stage. (21 Apr 2010)

Paschal Donohoe: For how long does the Minister anticipate these transitional provisions will need to be in place?