Results 2,481-2,500 of 12,886 for speaker:Paul Coghlan
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: I am not aware but I am advised that I do need the agreement of the House.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: I understood it was agreed.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: Senator McDowell wants to raise a point of order.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: I asked if it was agreed.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: The Senator will table it on Report Stage.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: I accept totally what the Senator is saying.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: I understood that there was agreement on that.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: That is superfluous. We have the agreement of the House. We are moving on. Amendment No. 77 is in the names of Senators Bacik, Humphreys, Nash and Ó Ríordáin. Is Senator Bacik moving that amendment?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: That will be checked.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: As I understand it, all are agreed that it will be taken care of.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: Is the Senator talking about section 44?
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: I call Senator Craughwell.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: We are on section 34.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: With respect, we are on section 34. The Chair has already ruled on the question of filibustering. We are monitoring the debate to ensure-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: Section 34.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: That is allowed. Please stick to section 34.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: The Senator has put it on the record.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: It is Senator Craughwell's point of view.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: That is a point of principle more suited to a Second Stage debate. We are on Committee Stage now.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (21 Nov 2018)
Paul Coghlan: Does the Minister wish to respond to any points made on the section?