Advanced search
Show most relevant results first | Most recent results are first | Show use by person

Search only David CullinaneSearch all speeches

Results 20,921-20,940 of 27,087 for speaker:David Cullinane

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: I refer to the point that I made. With respect, it is important that when a view is attributed to the Comptroller and Auditor General and he has clarified that it is not his view nor is it anywhere in the report, which states a discount rate of 5.5% would have been appropriate to derive the market value of the portfolio, it is fair to ask Mr McDonagh to withdraw that.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: Fair enough.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: It is easy because NAMA is mischaracterising the scene.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: The NAMA witnesses are disagreeing and mischaracterising it.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: When Mr. Stewart was responding to questions on the negotiations which had commenced in April 2013, he said it was his view, or interpretation, that the negotiations were between Tughans, Brown Rudnick and PIMCO. Is that what Mr. Stewart said?

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: Yes. At that time, and we are talking about 13 March 2014, NAMA also knew that Mr. Cushnahan was in line for a success fee.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: Yes.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: So NAMA was unable to join up those dots.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: Which is incredible and does not make sense.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: It does not make sense.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: It does not.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: No, it is the view.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: Yes.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: What about Frank Cushnahan?

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: Sorry, Chairman, look at the paragraph above. Context is everything and we have to be clear and fair.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: The paragraph above mentioned the success fee being split three ways - Tughans, Frank Cushnahan and Brown Rudnick. That is the context.

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: That is what the discussion was based on. Then the paragraph says, "The Board noted that PIMCO had advised that the negotiations had commenced".

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: I suggest the Chairman look at the paragraph above and before the words "The Board".

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: Sorry, it is page 118 of the report, where it says, "The Board noted that PIMCO". Before those words there is a reference to the £16 million of a success fee being split three way. It continues, "The Board noted that PIMCO had advised that the negotiations had commenced" and then goes on to mention Frank Cushnahan. If this was only to do with Brown Rudnick and PIMCO then why mention...

Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (24 Nov 2016)

David Cullinane: This is 13 March.

   Advanced search
Show most relevant results first | Most recent results are first | Show use by person

Search only David CullinaneSearch all speeches