Results 20,481-20,500 of 21,128 for speaker:James Reilly

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: With respect, I asked the Minister if she accepted the Fitzgerald report and she has not answered.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: What about the second question I asked the Minister about his contention that had the same urgency been shown before November——

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: I am asking the Minister for the benefit of the record of the House, not for press conferences.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: I am entitled to answers, Chairman.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: If the Minister answers the questions concisely and quickly there will not be a problem.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: Does the Minister believe she did everything she could have done between August and November? That is all I want to know.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: Does the Minister believe she did everything she should have done between August and November? That is all I want, a "yes" or "no" answer.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: Why were representatives of HIQA not sent to Portlaoise General Hospital? I asked that question earlier but did not receive a reply.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: We are in this position because of the decision made by him.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: Balderdash.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: Tá triúir anseo nach raibh seans acu labhairt agus tá beirt tar éis labhairt cheana féin. Ba cheart go mbeadh na daoine seo in ann labhairt.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: Does the Minister accept Mr. Fitzgerald's report? A simple "yes" or "no" will do.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: A simple nod would do. If she accepts his report, does she accept that his contention that if the urgency shown after 22 November was shown before that date, then much of the hardship inflicted on patients would have been avoided? Surely this criticism about a lack of urgency also applies to the Minister. Does she believe she did everything she could after August and before 22 November,...

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (Resumed) (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: Inadequately, unfortunately.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: I move amendment No. 2: To delete all words after "Dáil Éireann" and substitute the following: "—expresses its serious concern at the findings of recent reports into breast cancer services at the Midlands Hospital Portlaoise; regrets the deep distress caused by these failures to many patients and women in the midlands; concludes that the reports demonstrate serious failures in the...

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: I heard what the Minister stated.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: Does the Minister still maintain that the Department did not get the letter?

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: In that case, the Minister will be able to confirm that no acknowledgement of the letter is on file.

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: Dr. Naughton made the then Minister aware that despite the allocation of funding, none of the necessary specialist personnel were in place or had been advertised for, including surgeons, radiologists and pathologists. Dr. Naughton wrote that life would be much easier for him if he walked away because, at least in that case, patients would need to go elsewhere to get a service they deserved...

Cancer Services Reports: Motion (12 Mar 2008)

James Reilly: I know why. I was——