Results 1-9 of 9 for "moore street" segment:5406751
Did you mean: "more street" segment:5406751?
- Other Questions: National Monuments (13 Mar 2013)
Mick Wallace: I am aware that the Minister's remit is confined to Nos. 14-17 Moore Street. He stated that the remainder of the site is in the hands of An Bord Pleanála, Dublin City Council and the developer but the State, in the form of NAMA, has total control over the site. Nothing will happen without NAMA's permission. Is it possible that the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht could...
- Other Questions: National Monuments (13 Mar 2013)
Peadar Tóibín: To ask the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht if he will refrain from making any decision regarding the proposed works on the National Monument 14-17 Moore Street by chartered land in advance of the forthcoming report of Dublin City Council’s Moore Street Advisory Committee; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13124/13]
- Other Questions: National Monuments (13 Mar 2013)
Dara Calleary: To ask the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht when he will make a decision on the future development of 1916 Moore Street; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12982/13]
- Other Questions: National Monuments (13 Mar 2013)
Jimmy Deenihan: A decision will be made, whether "Yes" or "No", and after that it will be entirely up to the developer to proceed with the project. Although Nos. 14-17 Moore Street are a national monument, they are in private ownership. The only decision I have to make is whether the developer's proposal for the national monument is suitable and will not damage its integrity in any way. The remainder of...
- Other Questions: National Monuments (13 Mar 2013)
Sandra McLellan: To ask the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht if he will refuse to sign approval for the plans of chartered land for works on the National Monument at 14-17 Moore Street, in view of the fact that the company is now presenting modified plans which are subject to approval of planning applications which have not yet been submitted by chartered land and in view of the fact that if...
- Other Questions: National Monuments (13 Mar 2013)
Jimmy Deenihan: ...the project. There is also a proposal for the GPO which has more certainty because it can be controlled by the State. I am supporting the GPO proposal along with An Post and the OPW. As regards Moore Street, my only responsibility is to determine whether the proposal by the developer is suitable for Nos. 14-17, which are in private ownership. I have asked the developer to go through...
- Other Questions: National Monuments (13 Mar 2013)
Seán Ó Fearghaíl: ...share her views. I appreciate the intricacies of the planning system and the sensitivities involved but can the Minister indicate a definite timeframe in which a decision will be made on Nos. 14-17 Moore Street? It was previously suggested that tripartite meetings should be arranged between the National Museum, the Department and the developer. Have those meetings taken place? Is the...
- Other Questions: National Monuments (13 Mar 2013)
Jimmy Deenihan: I propose to take Questions Nos. 10, 38 and 42 together. Nos. 14-17 Moore Street are the subject of a preservation order under the National Monuments Acts. The effect of the preservation order is that any works affecting these properties require the consent of the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht under section 14 of the National Monuments Act 1930, as amended. The...
- Other Questions: National Monuments (13 Mar 2013)
Jimmy Deenihan: ...do with the granting of planning permission on this site. I want to make that clear, because there is an insinuation to that effect. All I have to do is to determine whether the proposal for 14-17 Moore Street is suitable for that monument. Planning permission was granted by Dublin City Council and I understand it was more or less unanimous, with no objections at the time it was...