Results 17,281-17,300 of 21,096 for speaker:Charles Flanagan
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I have it.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I will tell the Senator why I am shaking my head when he is finished.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: No. I was asked by Senator Norris if I would accept the amendment. I am less than comfortable accepting any amendment in the name of Senator McDowell without him being present. I do not believe it would be fair of me to do so, having regard to his role in this Bill. In any event, I do not have that choice because Senator Boyhan is withdrawing the amendment, which I am sure is in deference...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: He has said that.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: He may be a future Tánaiste.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I would like to briefly set the record straight on this. It is an important point and one I will reflect further on, having regard to the arguments put forward. Both I and the proposing Senator will reflect on that and we will come back to it on Report Stage.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I am not accepting this amendment. I rise because Senator Norris remarked on my flexibility. Lest he become carried away, I want to make it clear that I am not accepting this amendment because I do not believe the commission can be exempted in such a broad manner. In any event, as the amendment is in the course of being withdrawn, I will not elaborate further.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: We will come back to this. I note the Senator has withdrawn the amendment while at the same time reserving the right to re-enter it on Report Stage. I merely want to flag a reason for my inability to accept the amendment, which I am sure will also be the case at a later stage when we are discussing the Bill. I specifically sought the advice of the Attorney General on this matter. There is...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I will make two points. First, I will not be departing from the time-honoured principle and convention on the matter of the Attorney General's advice. Second, I say to Senator Craughwell, who invites me to sit around the table, that this is precisely what we are doing. We have been sitting around the table for 125 hours over 16 months.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I am prepared to give further consideration to it but I am not sure about any other means by which this issue can be addressed, other than through the Standing Orders of either House. That is why I have been perfectly happy to be here for 125 hours or, indeed, any other time it might take Senators to deal with the matter. However, I do not foresee another forum.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: Maybe we should go back to the point raised by Senator Bacik.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I did not impose any guillotine.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: It may have been referred to but it was not proposed by me.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I leave these matters in the hands of the Clerk of the Seanad and his able team.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I defer to the Leader of the House on all occasions-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I have been required by the Chairman to do so.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I do not have a clock on me.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: Completely.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: Senator Norris will be aware that prior to the debate on this Bill we had debate on the previous Bill that we described as the courts Bill and a similar amendment was made to that Bill, which transposed the import of the current section 49 before us onto that Bill. It was deemed to be more appropriate. That Bill has been passed by the Seanad. The point quite rightly made by Senator Norris...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed) (10 Jul 2019)
Charles Flanagan: I do not wish to contravene any Standing Order on the basis that the Senator has withdrawn the amendment, but I want to indicate my support for what all three Senators have said. It is a really important issue and one I will certainly look at. I am not sure if it is one that might be appropriate for Report Stage of this Bill, but it is one that is certainly deserving of favourable...