Results 17,101-17,120 of 18,737 for speaker:Michael McDowell
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: I am glad to see that.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: I would say my colleague, Senator O'Sullivan, is now under observation to see how he is going to deal with this.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: The purpose of amendment No. 2 is to make it clear in the Long Title to the Bill that the lay members should be a minority of the commission as constituted. At the moment Members will be aware that the Bill envisages at section 10 that it should consist of 17 members. In my view that is an unwieldy and unnecessarily large group of people and if the number of lay persons appointed under...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: To take the Minister's last point first, when we are tendering amendments to this legislation, they have to be coherent. If one is going to propose a minority of lay persons at a later point, and if one is going to propose amendment of the Bill by assiduously removing all the lay majority provisions in it, there is nothing incongruous about having the Long Title of the Bill reflect that...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: Exactly.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: The case for a large judicial appointments commission of the kind proposed, or as the text now stands, has not been made. It is excessively large and unwieldy. No good case has been made for having seven lay people and a chairperson, as envisaged by section 10(1)(j) and (k), constitute a majority of the board, and the number seven is clearly designed simply to outweigh numerically the ex...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: We will come to it. I am just saying that Senator Bacik mentioned that the Minister has come up with an amendment, but the purpose of the amendment is to say that under no circumstances will a retired foreign judge ever serve on the Irish judicial appointments commission. We will come to it in the fullness of time, and we will debate it thoroughly at that time, but I am just saying that it...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: I do not want to get into the detail of it. I want to reserve my right to come back in detail about it. I will not push the matter any further except to say that-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: I will leave it at that. I signal in advance my opposition to it.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: I am abiding by the ruling of the Chair.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: On that basis, I will end my reference to that amendment for the time being. The Minister has come in and said that it would be a major U-turn and, therefore, it cannot happen. The Chair told Senator Norris earlier that where reasons are not offered, groupings can take place whether he likes it or not. I am not contesting that ruling at all. The fact that it would be a U-turn for the...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: I move amendment No. 3:In page 7, line 14, after "of" where it firstly occurs to insert "advisory".
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: I move amendment No. 4:In page 7, after line 30, to insert the following:“(3) An order made under subsection (2)shall not have effect unless a resolution approving the order is passed by each House of the Oireachtas within 28 days of the making of the said order.”.
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: The proposal here is to insert a new subsection (3) into the commencement section, that is, section 1, on page 7. The purpose of this amendment is to give this House and the other House a second chance after the next election when, it is hoped, the Government will be free of some of its present influences and when the majority of Members of the Houses will be free to express their real views...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: No. I am saying to you-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: -----that my observation is not a threat. I am making the very simple point that an intelligent parliament, confronted with the opportunity to say "No" to the Bill, would stick with the current regime which is working very well and to which nobody is objecting and not waste €500,000 to establish this-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: -----quango and delay the process. The aim of amendment No. 4 in my name is simply to give whoever will be in office after the next general election the opportunity to say if this provision was wise in the first place or the result of the Independent Alliance's insistence on its insertion in the Constitution. That is the only argument I am making. We should give the Oireachtas another...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: An outstanding-----
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: I am agreeing with Senator Conway in making that unruly interjection. The Minister does have an outstanding record. The national interest would be served by amending the Bill to give the Houses of the Oireachtas a veto in deciding whether the legislation should ever be commenced. My final comment is that I fully acknowledge that in most cases commencement orders are made by way of a...
- Seanad: Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Report Stage (19 Nov 2019)
Michael McDowell: The Minister has again provided the short rationale that this is an unprecedented move, which must therefore be rejected. The argument was made earlier that-----