Results 1,601-1,620 of 32,837 for speaker:Catherine Connolly
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Chapter 4 is the longest chapter. Mr. Long has read the report.
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: The Comptroller and Auditor General has identified and set out concerns regarding the sale process. I cannot go through 25 pages in the 20 minutes available to me. Mr. Long has gone through the report.
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Mr. Long has the expert advice. The Comptroller and Auditor General has raised these concerns. Does Mr. Long accept them?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: I am asking Mr. Long whether he accepts the concerns the Comptroller and Auditor General has raised regarding the number of bidders, the restrictions given and the qualified nature of the opinion given by Lazard. The Comptroller and Auditor General has raised all of these concerns. If Mr. Long accepts them, that is okay; if he does not, I ask him to tell me which ones he does not accept.
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: It would really simplify matters if witnesses who have read the report either accept it or do not or tell me which concerns they do not accept. The Comptroller and Auditor General has raised concerns. I will go through some of them now-----
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: -----because Mr. Long is not identifying them for me, which is a pity, in a sense, because we are not here to accuse him of anything.
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Mr. Long was brought in to do a job and he is saying he did that job to the best of his ability. I am not questioning that, so he can relax. I am asking him whether he agrees with the concerns raised.
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Mr. Long is telling this committee that there was competitive tension-----
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: -----at all stages.
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: I will come back to Mr. Long on that.
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Mr. Long does not accept the Comptroller and Auditor General's concerns that there were questions about the competitive process. He has made a statement now. He can withdraw it if he wants but he is saying there was competitive tension.
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Had Mr. Long worked for NAMA prior to working on Project Eagle?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Has he worked for NAMA since working on Project Eagle?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Had he been part of a process of a sale of loans similar to Project Eagle?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Where was that?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Was it called Project Eagle as well?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: A loan portfolio similar to Project Eagle.
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: I ask Mr. Long to hold on for one second. Was the transaction similar to Project Eagle? What role did he have in it?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: Did Mr. Long advise on strategy? Did he evaluate the loans? Did he have a different role from that he had on Project Eagle?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (22 Nov 2016)
Catherine Connolly: It was broader in its scope than for Project Eagle and, therefore, it was not comparable.