Results 13,701-13,720 of 21,090 for speaker:Alan Kelly
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: The Chair's timing is great.
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: Mr. Sullivan was basically bypassed.
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: Mr. Sullivan was bypassed.
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: What does Mr. Sullivan mean when he says he saw the report?
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: Normally reports would go through Mr. Sullivan, in fairness.
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: Did the development board not bypass Mr. Sullivan in August as well?
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: The National Paediatric Hospital Development Board informed the Department directly about its concerns about the €200 million in August. This is not the first time.
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: To conclude, on the two occasions in August and November, meetings were not held but the National Hospital Development Board told Mr. Sullivan?
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: Considering Mr. Sullivan went through all the options-----
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: Considering that Mr. Sullivan went through all the options before, and I have outlined how that is reflected in the minutes, it is frankly amazing that the group did not come together to make a recommendation to the board. The steering group was set up in order to make recommendations and get into the detail. The steering group had gone through the detail but never actually made any...
- Public Accounts Committee: National Paediatric Hospital Development Board: Financial Statements 2017 (31 Jan 2019)
Alan Kelly: The principal decision.
- Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders' Questions (5 Feb 2019)
Alan Kelly: Answer the question.
- Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders' Questions (5 Feb 2019)
Alan Kelly: Who said that?
- Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders' Questions (5 Feb 2019)
Alan Kelly: A question was asked over here.
- Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders' Questions (5 Feb 2019)
Alan Kelly: Neither Minister is here.
- Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders' Questions (5 Feb 2019)
Alan Kelly: Government circulars are not worth the paper they are written on.
- Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders' Questions (5 Feb 2019)
Alan Kelly: It is not true.
- Ceisteanna ar Sonraíodh Uain Dóibh - Priority Questions: Cancer Screening Programmes (5 Feb 2019)
Alan Kelly: 46. To ask the Minister for Health if a guarantee will be provided that the 24-week delay in smear testing under the CervicalCheck programme has not adversely affected the health outcomes for some women [5414/19]
- Ceisteanna ar Sonraíodh Uain Dóibh - Priority Questions: Cancer Screening Programmes (5 Feb 2019)
Alan Kelly: As stated, there are comprehensive delays in screening women for cervical cancer. The delays have maximised at 24 weeks, if not longer. While I accept the Minister's bona fides in respect of why he did this, I ask him to provide a guarantee for the House that the delay will not have a significant impact on any woman's health prognosis.
- Ceisteanna ar Sonraíodh Uain Dóibh - Priority Questions: Cancer Screening Programmes (5 Feb 2019)
Alan Kelly: I accept the Minister's bona fides regarding the decision-making on this issue. However, I must question the making of a decision like this without knowing whether we had the resources to meet demand. The Minister is in a unique position which those of us in opposition are not. As for the consequences, I was glad to hear in reply to a previous question that the Minister's chief medical...