Results 13,581-13,600 of 16,849 for speaker:Dermot Ahern

Written Answers — Deportation Orders: Deportation Orders (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: It is noted that the address of the person concerned as supplied by the Deputy does not match the address currently on record for the person concerned. As it is incumbent on an applicant to notify my Department when they change address it would be in the best interest of the person concerned to inform my Department of his correct address without delay. The person concerned applied for...

Written Answers — Deportation Orders: Deportation Orders (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The case of the person concerned was examined under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act, 1999, (as amended), and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended), on the Prohibition of Refoulement. On 23 March 2010, I refused the person concerned permission to remain temporarily in the State and instead signed a Deportation Order in respect of him. The effect of the Deportation Order is that...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: I refer the Deputy to my previous replies to his Parliamentary Questions. I am informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) that the person in question was the subject of a Family Reunification/Permission to Remain application made by his brother in 2003. The Family Reunification/Permission to Remain application was refused in August 2004. I am further informed by...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The person concerned applied for asylum on 11 February 2004. In accordance with Section 9 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended), the person concerned was entitled to remain in the State until his application for asylum was decided. His asylum application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: I refer the Deputy to my previous replies to his Parliamentary Questions. I am informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) that a letter issued to the person referred to by the Deputy on the 20th April 2010. I am further informed by INIS that on receipt of a response from the person referred to by the Deputy the case will be considered further.

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The Judicial Review process in this case has been completed and the fact remains that this person falls under the Dublin II Regulation, (Council Regulation (EC) No. 343/2003). The Dublin II Regulation, is intended to prevent the phenomenon of 'asylum shopping' across Europe and sets out criteria for determining which Regulation State is responsible for examining an asylum application where...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: I refer the Deputy to my detailed Reply to his earlier Parliamentary Question, No 96 of Thursday, 2 July 2009, and the written Reply to that Question. The position in the State of the person concerned now falls to be considered for Subsidiary Protection in accordance with the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 518 of 2006) and this application is...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: I refer the Deputy to my Replies to his earlier Parliamentary Questions, Nos. 268 of Wednesday, 3 February, 2010, 198 of Thursday, 26 November, 2009 and 278 of Tuesday, 17 November, 2009, and the written Replies to those Questions. The position in the State of the person concerned now falls to be decided by reference to the provisions of Section 3 (6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended)...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The case of the person concerned was examined under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act, 1999, (as amended), and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended), on the Prohibition of Refoulement. Consideration was given to representations submitted on her behalf by her legal representative for permission to remain in the State. On 23 September 2009, I refused permission to remain...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The person concerned applied for asylum on 29 July 2003. In accordance with Section 9 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended), the person concerned was entitled to remain in the State until his application for asylum was decided. His asylum application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals...

Written Answers — Citizenship Applications: Citizenship Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: In the absence of more specific information, the Deputy will appreciate that I am unable to provide a definitive response in relation to the issue raised. If the late father of the person referred to in the Deputy's Question was an Irish citizen at the time of his birth then he is automatically entitled to Irish citizenship. If the person in question is not entitled to Irish citizenship by...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The person concerned applied for asylum on 15 March 2006. In accordance with Section 9 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended), the person concerned was entitled to remain in the State until her application for asylum was decided. Her asylum application was refused following consideration of her case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals...

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: I am informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) that a letter issued to the legal representative of the person referred to by the Deputy on 2nd February 2010 and that to date the documentation requested has not been received. I am further informed by INIS that a letter issued to the legal representative on 20th April 2010 and on receipt of a response from the legal...

Written Answers — Citizenship Applications: Citizenship Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: I am informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) that the person referred to by the Deputy made a Family Reunification application in May 2007. A decision in this case issued to the applicant on 19th January 2010 and a copy of the consideration detailing the reasons for the decision was also provided.

Written Answers — Asylum Applications: Asylum Applications (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The person concerned applied for asylum on 4 July 2006. In accordance with Section 9 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended), the person concerned was entitled to remain in the State until his application for asylum was decided. His asylum application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals...

Written Answers — Residency Permits: Residency Permits (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: I wish to refer the Deputy to the reply to Parliamentary Question No. 510 of Tuesday, 20 April, 2010. The position in relation to the person concerned as set out in that reply remains unchanged.

Written Answers — Residency Permits: Residency Permits (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: I am informed that the person concerned presented at Maynooth Garda Station on 24 March of this year and was granted an extension of her permission to remain in the State in line with that granted to her mother. The person in question currently has permission to remain in the State under Stamp 4 conditions valid until 23 March, 2013.

Written Answers — Residency Permits: Residency Permits (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The person concerned was granted Leave to Remain in the State for a six month period to 5 January 2010. This decision was conveyed in writing to the person concerned by letter dated 3 July 2009. This communication also set out the conditions attached to this permission to remain in the State which included a requirement that the person concerned would obey the laws of the State. On 4 January...

Written Answers — Residency Permits: Residency Permits (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The position in the State of the person concerned is that his asylum claims have been investigated by both the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, both of whom have concluded that the person concerned did not meet the criteria for recognition as a refugee. As a result, the person concerned was issued with a notification of intention to deport...

Written Answers — Deportation Orders: Deportation Orders (22 Apr 2010)

Dermot Ahern: The case of the person was examined under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act, 1999, (as amended), and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended), on the Prohibition of Refoulement. Consideration was given to representations submitted on his behalf by his legal representative for permission to remain in the State. On 25 March 2010, I refused permission to remain temporarily in the State...