Results 1,241-1,260 of 8,196 for speaker:Alice-Mary Higgins
- Seanad: Technological Universities Bill 2015: Report Stage (Resumed) and Final Stage (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: I move amendment No. 25:In page 30, between lines 24 and 25, to insert the following:"(l) at least 4 per cent of students have entered the applicant institution with no higher than a NFQ level 4,".
- Seanad: Technological Universities Bill 2015: Report Stage (Resumed) and Final Stage (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: This amendment is almost at the opposite end of some of today's discussion because it suggests that at least 4% of students would enter with an ordinary level leaving certificate. Institutes of technology provide multiple avenues for access to education. I worked for a long time in the south east with young people who were unemployed and many had poor leaving certificates. For example, one...
- Seanad: Technological Universities Bill 2015: Report Stage (Resumed) and Final Stage (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: Does the Minister of State expect those issues to be reflected to some degree in the equality statements she would receive from universities?
- Seanad: Technological Universities Bill 2015: Report Stage (Resumed) and Final Stage (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: On that basis I will not press the amendment.
- Seanad: Technological Universities Bill 2015: Report Stage (Resumed) and Final Stage (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: I second the amendment.
- Seanad: Technological Universities Bill 2015: Report Stage (Resumed) and Final Stage (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: It was extraordinary.
- Seanad: Technological Universities Bill 2015: Report Stage (Resumed) and Final Stage (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: I will echo that. There are many positive aspects of the Bill, so it makes me sad that there was a clear mindset from the beginning that the Bill was to be pressed through without amendment. Those watching will see all of these Report Stage amendments, but it is not usual to have so many. There were so many largely because clear and constructive proposals had not been taken on board. For...
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: A number of issues have already been covered so I will focus on one or two in particular. Before talking about JobPath, I have a few questions for Ms Murphy about the directive. I note that one of the aspects of the directive that has been very much welcomed by the European Trade Union Confederation and others is protection for trade union workplace representatives and for collective...
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: I will not come in again but there is one other area where the Minister was very clear. The Minister, Deputy Doherty, told me that people should be able to take the personal progression plan away from a meeting, seek advice on it and come back to suggest amendments. What is the information on this? Are there many examples of people who have suggested amendments and who have had those...
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: First, I want to confirm that this is Department headed paper; I am looking at it. I think the problem is not a number of individual cases because it should not fall on individuals and individual representatives - we need to move past clientelist politics - rather it is a question of where patterns are emerging. That is what we have asked Mr. Conlon about, namely, where there are patterns...
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: I want to get an answer to them.
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: So failure to sign a personal progression plan is not a grounds to withdraw payment?
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: Does the signing of the personal progression plan trigger the payment from the Department?
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: If people are choosing-----
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: The crucial issue is that if JobPath is part of the activation infrastructure that we provide, it needs to be that rather than a punishment. If someone-----
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: It is a year of someone's life. If people are choosing an active route to activation, be it back to education, Tús or CE, surely it is extraordinarily inappropriate to say that it has been decided that they will instead spend a year in purgatory and JobPath. I would like back to education, which is related, to be-----
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: It should not be. I agree.
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: Just because-----
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: No, a statement was made and I want to be clear. I am not opposing people being assisted in this respect.
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection: EU Employment Legislation and JobPath: Discussion (8 Mar 2018)
Alice-Mary Higgins: Rather, I am asking about mobility between schemes.