Results 10,421-10,440 of 11,979 for speaker:Billy Kelleher

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: The definitions section of the Bill outlines:“declarable income” means any money or other form of payment that a medical practitioner receives from a medical equipment supplier, its servants or agents, or pharmaceutical company and its servants or agents above the value of €600. There is potential for people to circumvent the provision by making multiple donations that...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: We might broaden the scope of the legislation. The current provision is quite restrictive as it purely refers to health care professionals. One could argue that the requirement should be already mandatory as the HSE reports and publishes details on the people who work in hospitals but are paid by pharmaceutical companies. The third issue raised by the Deputy was orphan drugs. I do not...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: The Bill states: " 'gift' means any voluntary transfer of money, grant for research, bursary, service or property without compensation above the value of €600.". Again, there is an acknowledgement in terms of the broad debate around the Bill that there may be a requirement to consider the matter in more detail on Committee Stage. Like everything else, having sponsored a Private...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: In terms of posts being paid for by pharmaceutical companies, we do not want to discourage charity or philanthropy. Certainly, that is something we all laud, applaud and encourage. All we are saying is that in the event of such posts being paid for, that it would be publicly declared. That would be the purpose. It is not actually defined in this Bill but I think that has been mentioned in...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: No, that is okay.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: In terms of diabetic testing equipment, if it is not a direct transfer of value to the clinician himself or herself, it probably would not be governed under this legislation as it is drafted. Primarily, the transfer of value would be to the patients. We can get into the detail at some stage. If the doctor is charging for the use of that equipment, then that would be covered.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: The equipment is.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: I do not believe that would be covered in this legislation as it stands. I mentioned that earlier. Some €10.7 million went directly to hospitals from drug companies and other entities, and that is not covered in this Bill.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: We could just broaden the scope of this Bill. It is important that we accept that there might be a need to broaden this Bill, and that has been referred to by the Minister in his observations, and in those of the Minister of State, Deputy Byrne, as well.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: There is a voluntary code among pharmaceutical companies to declare, but the individual in receipt of the gift can decline to publish his or her name. If a doctor does not want his or her name to be publicised, he or she can decline. There is no statutory obligation. That is a difficulty. A pharmaceutical company could be taking many clinicians abroad. Some people would allow their name...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: A value will be put on a trip. It will be said that the trip is being subsidised by a certain amount, and therefore a company is either under the limit or over the limit in terms of the obligation to declare, if this legislation were to be passed

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: Yes. The companies would not have to run around and count every receipt. It would be done. I do not believe it is onerous.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: I believe that this would help, and the reason I say that is because it would remove the potential for the public or individuals to have a view that there are conflicts. There is no doubt that as we look into the future, we will see much more international co-operation in terms of clinicians travelling abroad to conferences, being peer-reviewed across the globe and interacting with colleges...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: The medical device industry funding equipment, a unit or personnel would not be covered by this particular Bill unless the doctor is making personal gains from it. If he or she is working within the unit, there is no material benefit. However, if he or she is charging people to use that facility, that would be seen as a gift because there would be a gain to the health care professional in...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: It would be hard to argue that there would be a gift or a transfer of value if a person is just attending a lecture subsidised by a pharmaceutical company. If there is a transfer of value, for example in a situation where a GP or a clinician is getting something more than education or information from it, it would have to be declared. If they are merely attending an evening I would suggest...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: The Chairman raised an important point and this is why it should be teased out. The last thing one wants to do is sterilise interactions between research, pharmaceutical industries, academia, etc. People should not have to count the number of glasses of wine they had wondering if they had tipped over the threshold of €600.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: That is why we have a high threshold. Some people will argue that this threshold is much too high, because it could mean that multiple gifts worth less than €600 could be received over the course of a year and none of them would have to be declared. As I have said, we do not want to be onerous in this, but we want the Bill and its intent to be embraced. We can modify it to ensure...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: I thank the Chairman.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: I thank Ms Jackson for her observations on the Bill as proposed. I note her reaffirmation that the Minister and the Department strongly agree with the principles underpinning this Bill, and her Department's commitment to working with me and my advisers on the proposal. I personally do not mind who takes ownership of this Bill. Is the Department drafting legislation at the moment or is it...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health: Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2017: Discussion (6 Dec 2017)

Billy Kelleher: Is Ms Jackson saying that an entity, for example, a pharmaceutical company, would actually declare the amount transferred to individuals?