Results 861-880 of 9,252 for speaker:Jim O'Callaghan
- Appointment to the Judiciary Nomination Procedure: Statements (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: The Minister is not answering the first question.
- Appointment to the Judiciary Nomination Procedure: Statements (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: Were letters expressing an interest in the vacancy received?
- Appointment to the Judiciary Nomination Procedure: Statements (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: Having failed to answer my first question, the Tánaiste should answer my second question. She failed to answer the first question. She should answer the second.
- Appointment to the Judiciary Nomination Procedure: Statements (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: The second question was fairly simple.
- Appointment to the Judiciary Nomination Procedure: Statements (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: Why, on 23 May, did the Government not fill the Court of Appeal vacancy since JAAB had reported to the Minister on 16 May in respect of it?
- Appointment to the Judiciary Nomination Procedure: Statements (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: Sorry?
- Appointment to the Judiciary Nomination Procedure: Statements (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: Why not?
- Appointment to the Judiciary Nomination Procedure: Statements (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: How did the former Attorney General apply?
- Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Garda Stations (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: 174. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the dates and substance of contacts between his Department and the office of the Garda Commissioner regarding her report on the possible reopening of closed Garda stations; the process by which an interim report was requested and partial implementation of the report was agreed by government; and if he will make a statement on...
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: I thank Mr. Kelleher for attending and sharing his expertise with us. I have a couple of questions for him. Is he concerned about the way the legislation applies to State entities? I am thinking, in particular, of the fact that it requires data sharing to be carried out in accordance with law, but the law seems to be slightly extended. Am I right in saying it includes issues such as those...
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: With regard to a Minister processing a grant application, under the draft legislation, does it come within the definition of "in accordance with the law"? Is Mr. Kelleher's concern that if it is not set out in legislation, it could fall foul of the regulations?
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: Mr. Kelleher has mentioned his concern that a breach of data protection regulations by a State entity could expose the State to either a class action or the award of considerable damages. As Mr. Kelleher mentioned, the State has obviously faced representative actions before. The most serious, for example, were from women infected with damaged blood products. They received significant...
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: If there were a lot of these kinds of awards, it would be significant.
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: Mr. Kelleher also mentioned that he did not think that fines for public authorities were sufficient because the money is just going around in a circle. What else would he consider an appropriate penalty for a public authority?
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: What is the consequence for them, however, in terms of a penalty? They are informed that what they are doing is illegal.
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: One final question before I hand over to my colleagues. The witness mentions that he would prefer if the identification or processing of data were the responsibility of the State rather than that of the social media providers. Realistically speaking, is this market too big for the State to effectively regulate?
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: Or of identification?
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: How many members of staff might the State require to fulfil this identification function?
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: Would it be considerable?
- Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: General Scheme of Data Protection Bill 2017: Discussion (Resumed) (21 Jun 2017)
Jim O'Callaghan: We are just handing it over to the private sphere if the State does not get involved.