Results 861-880 of 2,343 for speaker:Michael Colreavy

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Budgetary Position and Editorial Policy: Discussion with RTE (22 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: Perhaps the institute of technology might use some of the facilities in Finisklin.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Budgetary Position and Editorial Policy: Discussion with RTE (22 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: Good.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Budgetary Position and Editorial Policy: Discussion with RTE (22 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: Do we have an assurance that there will continue to be a regional facility in Sligo?

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Budgetary Position and Editorial Policy: Discussion with RTE (22 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: There are difficulties but they can be overcome. What about impartiality?

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Budgetary Position and Editorial Policy: Discussion with RTE (22 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: I did not get an answer to the question on the initiatives in support of the Irish language. Perhaps a response could be sent on to the committee.

Written Answers — Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources: Television Licence Fee Collection (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: 115. To ask the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the number of homes here that do not currently pay for a television licence; if he will provide a breakdown of those who receive a waiver and those who do not pay for a licence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24840/13]

Written Answers — Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources: Broadcasting Charges (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: 122. To ask the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the amount he estimates will be returned to the State each year if the new broadcasting charge is introduced; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24907/13]

Written Answers — Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources: Renewable Energy Exports (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: 123. To ask the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the amount he intends to spend of renewable energy projects that will export energy to Britain; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24908/13]

Written Answers — Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources: Wind Energy Guidelines (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: 124. To ask the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources if there will be a social clause included in the wind farm project in Mount Lucas, County Offaly; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24909/13]

Written Answers — Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport: Road Projects Issues (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: 237. To ask the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport the position regarding the upgrading of the N16 Sligo road as part of the TEN-T comprehensive road network; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24919/13]

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: I thank Mr. Dillon. That was a very good outline of the issues. I would prefer to have each question answered in turn rather than asking seven questions at once.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: I broadly welcome this proposal. It is sensible. In the days when we had Telecom, the ESB and water services, I could never understand why a road could be dug up three or four times in a year. This is the IT equivalent of making sure that a road opening is done once and the services are provided. I understand the principle of subsidiarity. I also understand the House of Commons concerns...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: It might be useful to make informal contact with officials in the House of Commons to try to ascertain the position in case there are concerns that we have not considered.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: My second question is whether the Department has sought, or if it proposes to seek, the views of telecoms and other infrastructural providers, including the smaller locally based providers in this country. If the Department has been in contact with them, what was their response?

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: Will the Department be talking to the small and medium enterprises as well as IBEC?

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: Third, do the proposed regulations cover inter-country, cross-channel infrastructure?

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: I understand that.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: It would seem to make sense that inter-country connections, including submarine, would be covered.

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: Logic would dictate that the regulations would reduce the overall costs not only of deploying but also of maintaining electronic communications networks, but only if the skills of maintenance personnel are improved to cover fibre line maintenance as well as other maintenance. Will these regulations in any way dictate the range of skills required by workers on lines? I do not see it in the...

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications: Scrutiny of EU Legislative Proposals (23 May 2013)

Michael Colreavy: Fourth, in theory the impact of these regulations would be that there is a lower cost to the service user. Is there anything in them that will guarantee that there is a reduced cost to the service user rather than an increase in the profits of the service providers? Is that part of these regulations?