Results 61-80 of 170 for nama speaker:Marc MacSharry
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Given the narrowness that was highlighted by certain bidders, and the fact that is admitted in the Comptroller and Auditor General's report, does he believe NAMA is exposed under the 2010 EU remedies regulations or the Irish guidelines on public procurement?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Did Mr. McCarthy ask NAMA if it had sought sight of letters of release which would be common between solicitors acting in such a manner?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Was it wise not to do that? The witness said he had assurances that everything was above board, but he felt NAMA could go further. In saying that it could go further, does the witness think it should have sought those letters of release?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: I thank the witnesses for taking the time to be with us. I must ask this question first: why would NAMA make contact with selective members of the Committee of Public Accounts the week in advance of publication of the report?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Was it section 10 or was it that Michael and Peter had been on the telephone and NAMA had better take cognisance of the discretion and confidentiality that people are looking for? In essence, therefore, how can we be certain that section 10 was achievable?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Surely NAMA would not have to consider the socio-economic impact on the island of Fiji if property was being sold in Sligo. Therefore, why would it?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: In essence was the judgment of NAMA commercially led? In essence, was the action and information going into the boardroom tempered or influenced by diplomatic concerns rather than section 10?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Would Mr. McDonagh say the approach NAMA takes for the disposal of relatively low-priced assets, as I have said, was less thorough than that undertaken for the £1.6 billion transaction?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Does Mr. McDonagh believe they were equal? Why would NAMA look for three proposals and look for none in the context of something that was so big?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Has NAMA ever sold one of those?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Has NAMA ever done so on the basis of a reverse inquiry?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Why did NAMA not do that in this instance?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Was that because NAMA would have had a stock valuation on that property from the previous year end?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Why would NAMA not have done the same for the biggest transaction in the State?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Can the witnesses confirm that NAMA was aware that Mr. Cushnahan and Mr. Rowntree were directors of the Northern Ireland Housing Agency for a period?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Would NAMA have been equally aware that they resigned following a report into certain activities of that organisation?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (29 Sep 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Can Mr. Daly confirm that following this report, which may have led to the resignation of one or both of these individuals, NAMA renewed the contract of Mr. Cushnahan?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (6 Oct 2016)
Marc MacSharry: ...Comptroller and Auditor General she raised a concern about the 5% discount and the fact the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General had no expertise in this area. Were representatives from NAMA at that meeting?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (6 Oct 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Is it safe to assume that the position of the Department of Finance would mirror that of NAMA rather than that of the Comptroller and Auditor General?
- Public Accounts Committee: Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed) (6 Oct 2016)
Marc MacSharry: Bearing in mind section 2 of the Act on the interests of taxpayers, does the Minister not feel that they, as the ultimate shareholders in NAMA, are entitled to have maximum representation on the board as it undertakes works such as the disposal of €1.6 billion worth of assets?