Results 7,461-7,480 of 26,430 for speaker:David Cullinane
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: This is H6. Is it also correct that H6 made an added intervention in 2001 in respect of Grace being in a foster home?
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: I am asking if Mr. O'Brien is aware.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: Yes and I am asking if Mr. O'Brien is aware that in 2001, H6 made an added intervention on Grace's presence in the foster home.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: I do not know whether it is in the Devine report.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: That is not the question I asked. I asked if Mr. O'Brien was aware. I asked him the question and he asked me to further clarify it. I am asking if it is the case that this individual, H6, made an added intervention in 2001.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: Which is?
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: Please, yes.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: I am glad Mr. O'Brien clarified that. He has at least clarified the original question he was asked by Deputy Deasy, notwithstanding Mr. O'Brien's contention that he had a view that the Deputy was talking about other people or at least that Mr. O'Brien had different people in his mind, which is hard to understand. Anyway, we have dealt with that now. I have two simple, direct questions for...
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: Can I make one point? I want to give Mr. O'Brien leave to answer the question. With all due respect, Mr. O'Brien offers up as an excuse as to why the HSE did not contact An Garda Síochána prior to March 2015 the excuse that if the HSE had asked, An Garda Síochána would have said "no". The HSE did not ask and that is the point.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: Mr. O'Brien said in his opening statement-----
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: That is Mr. O'Brien's opinion.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: It is not wrong. With respect, Mr. O'Brien is not offering facts.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: No, he is not. With respect, what the witness is doing is offering his view as to why he did not contact An Garda Síochána. He said that one of the reasons was that if he had asked - he then cites references to a third party - it would have said "no". What I am saying is that this is an excuse because he did not ask. If he had asked, he might have got a different outcome. We...
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: I am not going backwards at all.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: I am not the one who is obfuscating.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: I am not the one who had landed us in a situation where Mr. O'Brien is back here today. I was not even a member of the committee.
- Public Accounts Committee: Correction of Record of Meeting of 2 February 2016 (23 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: The witness can have whatever opinion or view he wants and state whatever he believes are facts. I am entitled to my opinion and I have put my opinion. Could the witness answer the second question I put, which related to the levels of contact, if any, between the local office and the service providers regarding their funding?
- Leaders' Questions (28 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: Hear, hear.
- Written Answers — Department of Finance: NAMA Property Sales (28 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: 99. To ask the Minister for Finance if he has read the Committee of Public Accounts report into Project Eagle; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [15505/17]
- Written Answers — Department of Finance: NAMA Property Sales (28 Mar 2017)
David Cullinane: 138. To ask the Minister for Finance if he has read the Committee of Public Accounts report into the sale of Project Eagle; his views on whether it was procedurally inappropriate for him to have met a company (details supplied) 24 hours before the loan sale deadline; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [15504/17]