Results 6,821-6,840 of 36,188 for speaker:Pearse Doherty
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: I should let the Minister of State know that if I had my way, he would be paying a lot more than that.
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: The point is one cannot get information on an individual's effective tax rate. Similarly, I do not seek the individual tax rate for Apple, Google, Microsoft or the company down the street producing goods or providing services. Instead, I seek an analysis of the effective tax rates. This can be done for income tax and it has been beneficial because when members discuss income taxes, they...
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: May I answer the Minister of State's question?
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: The question can be answered. If the Minister was willing to do this, we can get our heads together and look at how we can present the data in a way that does not reveal the personal taxation issues of any company. Going back to my quote about statistics, one can dig deep into them. Recently The Irish Times carried a report which stated, in terms of the top 1,000 companies in the State...
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: Only one couple out of seven, namely John and Mary, were affected by the budget.
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: The Minister believed it was a brilliant budget; that is why. My point is that we do not want fictional Johns and Marys but data on the real Johns and Marys. We can do this in respect of income when we put all the Johns and Marys together. Statistics can be obtained on a certain proportion without giving away their identities. We can do the same for corporations. Research and...
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: I welcome the fact the Government will compile a report on this as it is confident that it is correct in this regard. This should be done in a joined-up approach to cover other areas in question. The question is are certain companies aggressively using mechanisms within the tax code to write down their taxable profits and, accordingly, paying a low tax rate. The suspicion is that it is a...
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: This is a substantive amendment, replacing section 40. This has happened before with the Bill. When there are such amendments, the sub-committee should receive a memorandum on them.
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: Does this amendment allow a farmer to dispose of land to persons outside of his or her family and still claim the relief?
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: The section was always confined to a child of a farmer. This is wealth the farmer has accumulated. Why should we allow this be introduced?
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: What about the requirement on the purchaser to farm the land?
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: Can they dispose of the land and obtain this relief?
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: This new section provides them with the relief for the first time if they dispose of the land. I can understand it with regard to renting the land and I do not have a big issue with it, even though it moves away from the child. Before this, in disposing of the land for the first time, if it went to the child, the relief would have been available.
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: In this section is there a requirement on the person who purchases the land to actually farm it?
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: Will the Minister of State explain that to me again?
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: That is exactly my point, 100%. The relief - 90% or something like this - is available for farmers to hand over the asset to the children and not be subject to capitals gains tax. We are now extending it to cover renting to people other than the child, which is understandable because if one rents the farm, it will be farmers who will farm it. If one disposes of it - this is about...
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: If I was a farmer in County Meath with a farm in the commuter belt, somebody was interested in building one or two houses on it and I was to dispose of my farm-----
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: I would obtain the relief, but somebody could build a couple of houses on the farm I had just sold, as happened a number of years ago.
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: Yes, but I have been farming it for ten years. The point is that up until now, if I was a farmer who had been farming for ten or more years and decided to hand over the farm to a child, I would have obtained this relief. It was provided to keep the farm in the family. I can now hand over the farm to anybody who can use it for any purpose, including building property, and still obtain the...
- Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance: Finance (No. 2) Bill 2013: Committee Stage (Resumed) (27 Nov 2013)
Pearse Doherty: Are they obtaining relief at a rate of 90% on the capital gains?