Results 41-60 of 124 for gsoc speaker:Clare Daly

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: Garda Oversight and Accountability: Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission (8 May 2019)

Clare Daly: ...of the members of the public who are not getting answers because the commission's hands are tied. The fact that the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform did not take on board the information of GSOC's lived experience of the shortcomings, and that GSOC is not being consulted in the real sense about the changes that are due, really sums up the Department of Justice and Equality. I...

Garda Síochána (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill 2014: Report Stage (Resumed) and Final Stage (5 Feb 2015)

Clare Daly: The Minister alluded earlier to the fact that she will be tabling some other amendments to deal with GSOC in the context of the imminent Garda authority legislation. The UN Human Rights Committee, in its periodic review last summer, made the point that there is an urgent need for Ireland to deal with this issue and strengthen the independence of GSOC while ensuring that the Garda authority...

Garda Síochána (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill 2014: Report Stage (Resumed) and Final Stage (5 Feb 2015)

Clare Daly: ...-changing. That is the point we are trying to address. It is very good that, for the first time, section 103 inserts a statutory and legal obligation on the Commissioner to provide information to GSOC. That is good and we are very happy with it but as Deputy Wallace said, it is only being provided in regard to section 102 inquiries. It is not being provided in sections 95 and 98, and...

Select Committee on Justice and Equality: Estimates for Public Services 2018
Vote 20 - An Garda Síochána (Revised)
Vote 21 - Prisons (Revised)
Vote 22 - Courts Service (Revised)
Vote 24 - Justice and Equality (Revised)
Vote 25 - Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (Revised)
Vote 41 - Policing Authority (Revised) (18 Apr 2018)

Clare Daly: I will not repeat the points about GSOC but €300,000 is not enough, that is clear. The Policing Authority receives €600,000, which is double that of GSOC. I would go so far as to say that the whole of the extra €600,000 allocated to the Policing Authority should instead be given to GSOC to allow it to do the job that it wants to. The points have been made about that...

Ceisteanna - Questions - Priority Questions: Protected Disclosures (23 May 2018)

Clare Daly: ...year ago that the investigations have concluded. The Minister for Justice and Equality calls these organisations to account. It is a fact that An Garda Síochána breached existing protocols with GSOC and refused to hand over files for five months. It is a fact that An Garda Síochána refused GSOC's request to sit in on the disciplinary hearings on behalf of four...

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission Administration (13 Jun 2013)

Clare Daly: 46. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality the steps he will take to improve the operation of the GSOC with particular reference to the problems they identified in their annual report 2012 and the fact that no names were mentioned in the investigation (details supplied). [28223/13]

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission Issues (10 Oct 2013)

Clare Daly: 158. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality the reason he has not enabled GSOC to access the PULSE system under the new protocols, despite their outlining on a number of occasions that this was necessary to enable them to carry out their function effectively. [42873/13]

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission Issues (27 Feb 2014)

Clare Daly: 32. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality his views on whether GSOC has been undermined, or strengthened, by the recent surveillance controversy; the action he proposes to take; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9675/14]

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Child Abuse Issues (8 Apr 2014)

Clare Daly: 421. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will instruct GSOC to carry out a section 106 investigation into the practices, policies and procedures in relation to the Garda national juvenile office and the lack of timely investigation of sexual crimes against children. [16057/14]

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Garda Misconduct Allegations (29 Jan 2015)

Clare Daly: 114. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality if she will confirm that a person (details supplied) was one of the gardaí involved in the Kieran Boylan case, against whom GSOC recommended that criminal charges should be brought. [4212/15]

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: Priorities for An Garda Síochána: Garda Commissioner (12 Oct 2016)

Clare Daly: It is very difficult to get an answer. How many protected disclosures would have been made directly to the Commissioner as distinct from the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission, GSOC?

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Garda Misconduct Allegations (7 Feb 2017)

Clare Daly: 114. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality when the outcome of the GSOC inquiry will be signed off and responded to by the Garda Commissioner with regard to a case that was before the independent review mechanism (details supplied). [5438/17]

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: Recent Issues Relating to An Garda Síochána: Acting Garda Commissioner Dónall Ó Cualáin (4 Oct 2017)

Clare Daly: The GSOC report was produced in 2008.

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission Data (7 Dec 2017)

Clare Daly: 105. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the number of section 83(2) complaints received by An Garda Síochána that were referred to GSOC in each of the years 2010 to 2016 and to date in 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52494/17]

Other Questions: Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission (6 Feb 2018)

Clare Daly: 53. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the steps he has taken to review the supports available to Garda whistleblowers, particularly in view of GSOC's acknowledgement of its lack of resources in fulfilling this function; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5652/18]

Written Answers — Department of Justice and Equality: Garda Operations (19 Sep 2018)

Clare Daly: 80. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if he will request GSOC to undertake an investigation of the activity of gardaí during an eviction at a location (details supplied) on 11 September 2018. [37983/18]

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: Interim Report on Review of Youth Referrals: An Garda Síochána (13 Feb 2019)

Clare Daly: If a garda was the subject of a Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission, GSOC, criminal investigation, would that be reason for an automatic suspension?

Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality: Garda Oversight and Accountability: Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission (8 May 2019)

Clare Daly: Did GSOC ask An Garda Síochána why it was not told about the issue and, if so, was it given an answer?

Written Answers — Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources: ComReg Investigations (11 Mar 2014)

Clare Daly: ...the instructions he has issued to ComReg to investigate the noted unlicensed transmission identified by the reported broadcast of a UK GSM cellular ID in the Middle Abbey Street area, near the GSOC HQ in the Verrimus report. [10848/14]

Select Committee on Justice and Equality: Estimates for Public Services 2017
Vote 16 - Valuation Office (Revised)
Vote 20 - An Garda Síochána (Revised)
Vote 21 - Prisons (Revised)
Vote 22 - Courts Service (Revised)
Vote 23 - Property Registration Authority (Revised)
Vote 24 - Justice and Equality (Revised)
Vote 25 - Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (Revised)
Vote 41 - Policing Authority (Revised) (12 Apr 2017)

Clare Daly: In respect of the money for the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission, GSOC, €1 million has been provided for what we might call a second penalty point investigation that never took place. Is that money being provided again or has any effort been made to find out why it was not spent?