Results 5,321-5,340 of 23,109 for speaker:Paddy Burke
- Seanad: Intoxicating Liquor (National Convention Centre) Bill 2010: Second and Subsequent Stages (25 May 2010)
Paddy Burke: When is it proposed to sit again?
- Seanad: Business of Seanad (25 May 2010)
Paddy Burke: As the Minister is answering questions in the Dáil, we have no option but to suspend the sitting.
- Seanad: Business of Seanad (25 May 2010)
Paddy Burke: Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: We will get to that amendment later.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendments Nos. 3 and 53 are related to amendment No. 2 and all may be discussed together.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 10 is consequential on amendment No. 8. Amendment No. 11 is an alternative to amendment No. 10 and must be discussed with it or else there would not be an opportunity to discuss amendment No. 11. Amendments Nos. 18 and 24 are related to amendment No. 11. Therefore amendments Nos. 8, 10, 11, 18 and 24 will be discussed together. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendments Nos. 9 and 25 are related and may be discussed together. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 11 cannot be moved.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: It was already discussed but it cannot be moved because amendment No. 10 has been agreed to.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendments Nos. 12 and 42 are related and may be discussed together. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 17 is in the name of Senator Bacik.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendments Nos. 17, 31, 32, 34 and 35 are of the same nature and can be discussed together.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Does the Senator want to speak to the other amendments?
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 31 is in the name of the Senator.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 21 in the names of Senators Regan and Cummins has been ruled out of order by the Cathaoirleach as it would involve a charge upon the people. It seeks that developers would be liable for VAT on 100% of the purchase price while only initially receiving 95% of the price.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 23 is a Government amendment. This amendment needs a recommital proposal and I ask the Acting Leader to propose a recommital.
- Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages (1 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Amendments Nos. 29 and 30 are alternate to amendment No. 28. Amendments Nos. 28 to 30, inclusive, can be discussed together by agreement. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Order of Business (2 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Will the Leader arrange a debate on the ban on non-commercial domestic turf cutting which is an important issue for rural Ireland? If the Minister attended the House for such a debate, we could go a long way towards resolving the matter. We could make proposals to the Minister if he was in a position to listen to the experience of those affected by the ban. I also seek a debate on funding...
- Seanad: Whistleblowing in the Financial Sector: Statements (2 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: I welcome the Minister of State.
- Seanad: Whistleblowing in the Financial Sector: Statements (2 Jun 2010)
Paddy Burke: Is that agreed?