Results 5,061-5,080 of 23,109 for speaker:Paddy Burke

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: The Senator is straying from the amendment.

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Does the Minister of State wish to respond?

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: That point concerns the section more than the amendment. I will let the Senator contribute on the section later.

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: The Senator is moving away from the amendment.

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Senator Ó Brolcháin mentioned the appointment of staff as authorised persons by local authority members. I do not think members of local authorities have appointed any staff to local authorities since the time of rate collectors, or at least since the time of sheep dipping committees when sheep dipping inspectors were appointed. Section 16(2) mentions "[a] body with which a local authority...

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Is the Senator saying local authorities are not independent?

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: We are talking about registration and everything.

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: It was an outburst.

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: I thank the Minister of State for clarification on the section. He stated that it is up to each local authority, when they have gauged the number of people who have registered, to decide on the appointments with the veterinary surgeon. It can go down the other route of employing a body like the ISPCA and entering into a contract. That body may be better organised on the ground and the...

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Senator Mullen, is amendment No. 18 being pressed?

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Is amendment No. 18 being pressed?

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: When is it proposed to take the next Stage?

Seanad: Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed) (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: When is it proposed to sit again?

Seanad: Community Development. (9 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Does Senator O'Reilly have a question?

Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (10 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Is amendment No. 22 being pressed?

Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (10 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 28 is related to and is an alternative to amendment No. 27. Amendment No. 33 also is related. Amendments Nos. 27, 28 and 33 may be discussed together. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (10 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: As amendment No. 30 is an alternative to amendment No. 29, amendments Nos. 29 and 30 may be taken together. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (10 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 36 is a Government amendment. Amendment No. 37 is alternative to it and they may be discussed together by agreement. Is that agreed? Agreed. Government amendment No. 36: In page 7, subsection (3), line 26, to delete "shall effect" and substitute "shall, at its expense, effect".

Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (10 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Amendments Nos. 38 and 39 are cognate and may be discussed together by agreement. Is that agreed? Agreed. Government amendment No. 38: In page 7, subsection (5), line 36, to delete "transferred land" and substitute "transferred common areas".

Seanad: Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (10 Mar 2010)

Paddy Burke: Amendment No. 40 is a Government amendment to which amendment No. 41 is an alternative and amendment No. 43 is related. Amendments Nos. 40, 41 and 43 may be discussed together. Is that agreed? Agreed. Government amendment No. 40: In page 8, lines 28 to 32, to delete subsection (1) and substitute the following: "9.--(1) Where in respect of a multi-unit development the development stage has...