Results 461-480 of 2,156 for speaker:Tom Parlon
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: A total of 99.9% of the fish went up the river.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: People in Clonmel would be very happy to have the scheme they have in Kilkenny, and they would not be overly concerned about half a dozen fish.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: That is all the evidence I saw.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: I like to deal with facts.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: I have seen no evidence of any more.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: The Senator knows that if it was on a profit-making basis, Kilkenny would never have had its flood relief scheme.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: The Senator is the one who raised it and created a big issue about six fish.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: I spent the day there yesterday.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: Some modification has been carried outââ
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: We are talking about six fish.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: Where is the evidence?
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: Which ones were those?
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: That is the only evidence I have seen. A Deputy in the other House gathered them together one day and got a photograph taken of them.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: I never launched a flood scheme in south Galway.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: The Senator should stick to the facts.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: The Senator is misrepresenting the facts of that scheme.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: Correction, I challenged the other spokesman.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: The Senator obviously was not invited.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: That sounds like sour grapes.
- Seanad: Appropriation Act 2004: Statements. (8 Feb 2005)
Tom Parlon: If the Senator was not there he should not tell me about it.