Results 4,501-4,520 of 9,840 for speaker:Pat Moylan
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Questions to the Leader, please.
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: That is not relevant to the Order of Business.
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Time now, Senator.
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Senator, you time has expired.
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: No, Senator, you may ask it next week.
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Thank you Senator, but you are way over time.
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Finally, I call Senator Mullen.
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: That is clarification, not a point of order.
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: I will not allow Senators to use the point of order as a guise for disorderly contributions or clarification. A point of order can only be used to clarify the procedure of the House and does not include making an objection to the content of any contribution by a Member.
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Is the Order of Business agreed to?
- Seanad: Order of Business (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: That is not a point of order. The Leader indicated that as business progressed, he would be in a position to clarify the matter.
- Seanad: Adoption Bill 2009: Report Stage (Resumed) (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Amendments Nos. 13 and 14 are related and will be discussed together.
- Seanad: Adoption Bill 2009: Report Stage (Resumed) (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Is the amendment seconded?
- Seanad: Adoption Bill 2009: Report Stage (Resumed) (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Amendments Nos. 17 to 20, inclusive, 32 and 34 are related and may be discussed together.
- Seanad: Adoption Bill 2009: Report Stage (Resumed) (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: As Senators Norris or Bacik are not here to move amendment No. 21, the amendment lapses.
- Seanad: Adoption Bill 2009: Report Stage (Resumed) (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Amendment No. 62 is a technical alternative to amendment No. 61 and they will be taken together by agreement of the House.
- Seanad: Adoption Bill 2009: Report Stage (Resumed) (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Amendment No. 64 is out of order because it was negatived on Committee Stage.
- Seanad: Adoption Bill 2009: Report Stage (Resumed) (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: Amendments Nos. 66, 72 and 73 are related and may be discussed together, by agreement. Is that agreed? Agreed.
- Seanad: Adoption Bill 2009: Report Stage (Resumed) (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: According to the order of the House, I call the Leader to move the adjournment of the debate.
- Seanad: Adoption Bill 2009: Report Stage (Resumed) (14 May 2009)
Pat Moylan: The Leader is referring to that particular Bill.