Results 3,421-3,440 of 20,831 for speaker:David Norris
- Seanad: Mental Capacity and Guardianship Bill 2007: Second Stage (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: We will be diminished by her absence. We have not always seen eye to eye but she has offered something important to this House which will be missed. I refer not only to her care and concern for vulnerable people, which she has displayed in producing this Bill, but also to her medical expertise, which will be lacking on the backbenches. One can never tell, however, who will pop up at the...
- Seanad: Mental Capacity and Guardianship Bill 2007: Second Stage (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: It sounds good but it is not, life is not like that. Sometimes people apply for these without realising all the implications. Someone mentioned that there was a difficulty with a ward of court who needed alterations to her house. That is the same as taking up one of these equity release schemes. It gives a bank equity and its permission is needed to install a chair lift or similar...
- Seanad: Mental Capacity and Guardianship Bill 2007: Second Stage (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: No one can say for definite that we will be here. I remember very well what happened to you, honey, when you came along with a poster stating, "When shall we three meet again?" and you met your fate. I will not tempt providence.
- Seanad: Mental Capacity and Guardianship Bill 2007: Second Stage (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: I am not a bit gleeful. To adapt Oscar Wilde, and I am sure he thought of saying this if he did not say it, I have never understand the idea of tempting providence because it is older than the whole bloody lot of us put together and should be able to resist temptation. I will not bank on providence being able to resist temptation in my case because, over the years, I have been a deliciously...
- Seanad: Business of Seanad (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: We are only keeping the President up.
- Seanad: Business of Seanad (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: The House is entitled to an explanation. The Leader evidently believes there is some justification for her position. She has been advised the Bill must be passed by midnight. It would be helpful if we were to know why this is so. I said jocosely when it was first announced it had to be passed by that time because the President wants to go to bed.
- Seanad: Business of Seanad (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: It is a reasonable human need but if this is an emergency the watchdog of Ireland cannot sleep. If there is a real reason perhaps the Leader could share it with us, or has she just been told it must be passed by midnight? If that is all she has been told, that is showing considerable disrespect to Seanad Ãireann and to those of us who stayed on late in order to take part in the debate.
- Seanad: Health Insurance (Amendment) Bill 2007: Second Stage (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: There is a note of farce about this because we have not been told the reason for it. I am happy to accept the Bill if it closes off a loophole and is urgently and legally necessary but we have not been given any reason, we have simply been informed that the Attorney General says it is necessary. We are entitled as a House to be treated with respect and to be fully informed.
- Seanad: Health Insurance (Amendment) Bill 2007: Second Stage (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: Most reasonable people would agree that the phoenix syndrome should be prevented, where companies could be formed in Dublin and, when they must meet their tax liability, collapse and a new paper company formed. We had this situation in the entertainment industry and apparently it now exists in the health service. I believe the Department was aware of this possibility and it should have...
- Seanad: Health Insurance (Amendment) Bill 2007: Second Stage (21 Feb 2007)
David Norris: ââI support it. We need a service for the sick and elderly, those who need it, and if this provides it, I am all for it but we are entitled to be told why there is such unseemly haste.
- Seanad: Order of Business (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: Why not?
- Seanad: Order of Business (Resumed) (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: My credentials regarding what occurred yesterday are reasonably beyond question because I took part in the various health debates. I was dining last evening and, by accident, I happened to look at the monitor and saw that we were to be summoned back to the House at 10.55 p.m. I asked various people if they knew the reason for this development but was informed that they had no idea. I am...
- Seanad: Order of Business (Resumed) (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: We are entitled to know the nature of the Attorney General's advice. I presume this advice was provided and that we were not misled further. If it was given, what was the nature of it and was it wrong? In my opinion, questions arise regarding the Attorney General's credibility in this matter. On another matter, we should have another debate on the media. We are currently discussing the...
- Seanad: Order of Business (Resumed) (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: We did not know about the emergency legislation at that stage.
- Seanad: Order of Business (Resumed) (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: Senator Henry and I were both present. I do not know whether the Leader even knew what it was at that stage. The announcement had not been made.
- Seanad: Order of Business (Resumed) (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: The advice was wrong. Questions should be raised about that.
- Seanad: Order of Business (Resumed) (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: The Attorney General gave incorrect advice. This is a serious matter. If the Attorney General misadvised the Government, there is a situation that must be examined.
- Seanad: Order of Business (Resumed) (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: The advice was obviously wrong.
- Seanad: Order of Business (Resumed) (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: The point is that the Attorney General misadvised the Government.
- Seanad: Order of Business (Resumed) (22 Feb 2007)
David Norris: Maybe the Attorney General was wrong.