Results 301-320 of 2,099 for speaker:Ivor Callely
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: The system will remain as it is with regard to detection, the issue of summons, and the process of prosecution. The only change is that we are allowing for a service provider to administer the collection of the fixed charge. The purpose of this is to take pressure off the system.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: He puts it through the system.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: That is correct.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: Yes.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: It gives that option.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: If the Senator does not pay, he will go to court. The service provider will have a list and if the Senator decides to pay the charge, the service provider will record that and notify the Garda SÃochána. If, on the other hand, the Senator decides not to pay, the service provider will notify the Garda SÃochána that no payment has been received and the Garda will issue a summons and...
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: No.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: The question has been answered. The service provider's role is finished at that stage.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: No.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: Either one pays or one does not. It is a matter for the individual to decide.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: One would pay the service provider.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: To be helpful, it is only an option for the person who has caused the offence to utilise the service provider to pay the fixed charge. He or she does not have to do this. He or she can allow matters to proceed, as is currently the practice, and appear in court on the offence. It is only an option. The only part the service provider will play is in regard to the collection of the...
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: Agreed.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: I have already dealt with this amendment.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: The amendment was not moved but was discussed with amendment No. 2.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: No.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: For the benefit of the House, I restate that the only involvement of the service provider is to receive the fixed charge. The service provider has no influence over the quantity of items that may be presented for processing. In other words, the service provider cannot drum up extra business or compel any individual to avail of the fixed charge administration route in lieu of going to court.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: There is a penalty of â¬3,000.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: Yes.
- Seanad: Road Traffic Bill 2004: Committee Stage. (14 Dec 2004)
Ivor Callely: With regard to Senator McDowell's earlier question, I mistakenly stated that the penalty for the offence was â¬3,000. The penalty is â¬800 for a first offence and â¬1,500 for a second offence. I confused the offence with not producing a driver's licence, which attracts a â¬3,000 penalty. In reply to Senator Finucane, one can nominate the station at which one wants to produce the licence....